toots wrote:
Quote:
Detective Inspector Chris Hanson, of the West Midlands police public protection unit, said Stinson's video sting on Sam had been thoroughly investigated by specialist child abuse investigation officers who also made their own extensive inquiries and found no evidence of any sexual offences. But Sam said that came too late to prevent social workers asking him to move away from his children temporarily and his life being threatened by strangers.
This is part of the same story.
Quote:
found no evidence of any sexual offences.
Okay and did you see the guy on the channel 4 program who walked away and wasn't charged or prosecuted?
No evidence of sexual offences doesn't mean that it never happened only that it couldn't be proven.

I realise that, but, in this country we are supposed to be innocent until proven guilty. Not always the case I know but we have to stick with this or the whole system just breaks down. I want nothing more than proven sex offenders and pedos prosecuted to the full extent of the law but I also don't want innocent people suffering in the process. I don't know who is innocent or guilty in the cases written by the Guardian but I would like to think that if there are any innocent parties they are protected. I have read a lot of the messages posted by Stinson and I have to say they all make me feel sick to the stomach but I haven't seen all the messages regarding Sam so I can't really comment with any certainty. All in all there is good coming from what he does he just has to make sure he does it properly and ensures his facts are correct before posting things. Being a bit of a perv that likes to go on adult chat sites does not make you a pedo. I hope he continues but what I really hope for is that he doesn't need to but that is never going to happen