Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 2:38 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: mommys right here
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2016 6:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:04 am
Posts: 2555
poor fooking gorilla,17 years old & shot dead because some parent cant look after there kid ffs, the mother should have been shot tbh, " mommy's right here" sorry, you should have been there anyway & it shouldn't have happened if you supervised your kid ffs!! " mommy loves you " fooking cow :evil:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ively.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
from all accounts the gorilla was trying to help and protect the child so why couldn't they use a tranquiliser dart instead ?

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
edders23 wrote:
from all accounts the gorilla was trying to help and protect the child so why couldn't they use a tranquiliser dart instead ?

The reason that a tranquillise dart could not be used was explained by someone from the zoo. Firstly the pictures show the Gorilla dragging the child through the water on more than one occasion. The use of a dart would take several minutes to take effect and the behaviour of the gorilla during that time would have been unpredictable.
Without knowing the full history of the gorillas behaviour over the years it is not easy for some of us to accept that this was the safest course of action to ensure the safety of the child. I don't think they would have shot the gorilla if they were certain of a safe outcome by any other means.
Many people are quick to condemn the mother for he lack of supervision of the child, myself, I will reserve judgement until there has been a proper investigation carried out.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:04 am
Posts: 2555
grandad wrote:
edders23 wrote:
from all accounts the gorilla was trying to help and protect the child so why couldn't they use a tranquiliser dart instead ?

The reason that a tranquillise dart could not be used was explained by someone from the zoo. Firstly the pictures show the Gorilla dragging the child through the water on more than one occasion. The use of a dart would take several minutes to take effect and the behaviour of the gorilla during that time would have been unpredictable.
Without knowing the full history of the gorillas behaviour over the years it is not easy for some of us to accept that this was the safest course of action to ensure the safety of the child. I don't think they would have shot the gorilla if they were certain of a safe outcome by any other means.
Many people are quick to condemn the mother for he lack of supervision of the child, myself, I will reserve judgement until there has been a proper investigation carried out.


well lets enlighten you then, the kids father has a criminal record as long as your arm for drug offences, the mother also ( not as long though ) so the kid is on a hiding to nothing for his start in life, probably be better off letting the fooking gorillas bringing the kid up tbf, they are just junkies


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
ven2112 wrote:
grandad wrote:
edders23 wrote:
from all accounts the gorilla was trying to help and protect the child so why couldn't they use a tranquiliser dart instead ?

The reason that a tranquillise dart could not be used was explained by someone from the zoo. Firstly the pictures show the Gorilla dragging the child through the water on more than one occasion. The use of a dart would take several minutes to take effect and the behaviour of the gorilla during that time would have been unpredictable.
Without knowing the full history of the gorillas behaviour over the years it is not easy for some of us to accept that this was the safest course of action to ensure the safety of the child. I don't think they would have shot the gorilla if they were certain of a safe outcome by any other means.
Many people are quick to condemn the mother for he lack of supervision of the child, myself, I will reserve judgement until there has been a proper investigation carried out.


well lets enlighten you then, the kids father has a criminal record as long as your arm for drug offences, the mother also ( not as long though ) so the kid is on a hiding to nothing for his start in life, probably be better off letting the fooking gorillas bringing the kid up tbf, they are just junkies

What kind of security is in place at the zoo if a 4 year old is able to gain access to the gorilla enclosure. I will wait until the full investigation has been carried out before laying blame.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
grandad wrote:
edders23 wrote:
from all accounts the gorilla was trying to help and protect the child so why couldn't they use a tranquiliser dart instead ?

The reason that a tranquillise dart could not be used was explained by someone from the zoo. Firstly the pictures show the Gorilla dragging the child through the water on more than one occasion. The use of a dart would take several minutes to take effect and the behaviour of the gorilla during that time would have been unpredictable.
Without knowing the full history of the gorillas behaviour over the years it is not easy for some of us to accept that this was the safest course of action to ensure the safety of the child. I don't think they would have shot the gorilla if they were certain of a safe outcome by any other means.
Many people are quick to condemn the mother for he lack of supervision of the child, myself, I will reserve judgement until there has been a proper investigation carried out.



But they used a bullet while the gorilla was close to the child? It's a travesty, the gorilla didn't deserve to be killed like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Nidge2 wrote:


But they used a bullet while the gorilla was close to the child? It's a travesty, the gorilla didn't deserve to be killed like that.

What would you have done if it had been your call?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 10:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
I think the right decision was made, maybe the gorilla would have been protective but who was going in to get the child, a tranq shot often antagonises the animal hit....

if it had been my child id agree with the decision and accept the flak for the child getting dropped into the enclosure

5hit happens

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016 ... n-motorway

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
grandad wrote:
Nidge2 wrote:


But they used a bullet while the gorilla was close to the child? It's a travesty, the gorilla didn't deserve to be killed like that.

What would you have done if it had been your call?


Dart first then, if the Gorilla was showing signs that it was going to harm the boy then let loose with a bullet. The gorilla wasn't showing any signs at all, it was protecting the boy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Nidge2 wrote:
grandad wrote:
Nidge2 wrote:


But they used a bullet while the gorilla was close to the child? It's a travesty, the gorilla didn't deserve to be killed like that.

What would you have done if it had been your call?


Dart first then, if the Gorilla was showing signs that it was going to harm the boy then let loose with a bullet. The gorilla wasn't showing any signs at all, it was protecting the boy.


The animals reaction to the dart would be instant, the kiddy would be ripped apart....

sad decision, but the right 1

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
wannabeeahack wrote:

The animals reaction to the dart would be instant, the kiddy would be ripped apart....

sad decision, but the right 1



How do people know? Some darts can sedate in under a minute.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:04 am
Posts: 2555
Nidge2 wrote:
grandad wrote:
Nidge2 wrote:


But they used a bullet while the gorilla was close to the child? It's a travesty, the gorilla didn't deserve to be killed like that.

What would you have done if it had been your call?


Dart first then, if the Gorilla was showing signs that it was going to harm the boy then let loose with a bullet. The gorilla wasn't showing any signs at all, it was protecting the boy.


tbh that's what i thought , 2 or more guns aimed & ready, first one tranq, if it kicked off then the bullets, if it got the tranq it would have probably got startled & ran off anyway, its a shame, anyway done now, big proud 17 year old gorilla killed because of neglectful parents eusasmiles.zip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 6:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Nidge2 wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:

The animals reaction to the dart would be instant, the kiddy would be ripped apart....

sad decision, but the right 1



How do people know? Some darts can sedate in under a minute.


ever seen a silverbacks teeth?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
while i wouldnt have dropped one of my kids in a gorilla pit id have shot the animal myself....

gorilla didnt DESERVE it but the child was at risk

human life always has to come first

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: mommys right here
PostPosted: Thu Jun 02, 2016 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 7:04 am
Posts: 2555
wannabeeahack wrote:
while i wouldnt have dropped one of my kids in a gorilla pit id have shot the animal myself....

gorilla didnt DESERVE it but the child was at risk

human life always has to come first


well, sometimes .... if it was a junkie that had od`d ,well, i would have shot the junkie :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 217 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group