alan G wrote:
You really go over the top with your stupidity, don't you!!! Contrary to your lies you and/or JD posing as Kelly have not been banned from
www.fastblacks.com Err, neither I nor JD claimed that he'd been banned, although I did intend asking him
The fact is that I tried on several occasions yesterday to log on to your site, but was refused access. Having used several phpbb forums over the years I've never had a problem logging on unless there has been a genuine problem. Perhaps you disabled my account temporarily but then forgot about it or changed your mind? Given that you've banned most of your other off-message contributors recently and relegated my response to the substantive issue to the 'childish retorts' section (but left the real childish retorts against myself in situ) then I think I was entitled to conclude that I'd been excluded from your forum, or perhaps I'd just been sent to the sin bin for a few hours
By the way, no need to plug your site, your link is still one of a handful of similar sites on our links page.
Quote:
The way you throw accusations about beggars belief. By your own admission you know precious little about the world of IT ....
I can't recall ever saying that.
All I've said (effectively) is that I know less than some people, but I'm pretty sure I know more than most internet users, so I think to accuse me of 'knowing precious' little is overegging the pudding.
Quote:
....yet on the basis of this self-same ignorance.you dare to accuse me of lying about where I gained access to your site directory, of stealing a document published on a web server, and now of banning you from a forum.
As I've repeatedly said, knowledge of the internet wasn't the relevant point - for example, I pointed out that those in the know could hack into the Pentagon's computer, but personally I couldn't, but the point is that you failed to proffer evidence relating to how you found the Salteri document, not to mention other aspects that I've repeated ad nauseum but yet you refuse to answer directly.
Quote:
As expected your usual ignorant crony "sewage from sussex" joins in, despite knowing absolutely nothing about the subject matter. (Nothing new there)
I assume that he's read the evidence and drawn his own conclusions therefrom.
Quote:
Personally, I am sick and tired of you and your pettymindedness. I see no point in further dialogue. Suffice it to say now that you WILL be banned on Fastblacks unless you stop your childish and pathetic attempts at justifying your own inability to admit you are and were wrong.
Yes, it is a bit tiresome at times, but don't forget who set the ball rolling, and refuses to answer questions on the matter.
But it's good fun as well
Quote:
"to find that JD/Kelly has proven himself and TDO to be liars"
"My "part" in this was to reveal the duplicity of certain parties and expose them for the liars they are."
These were the phrases I used, which you took as calling you a liar?
TDO refers to your site here and the parties responsible for interfering in other areas, which you claim you do not.
Re the statement highlighted above, it seems a bizarre turn of phrase to refer to a website in this way rather than an indvidual person. Would anyone reasonably refer to a website as a liar? Thus your reference is prima facie to me personally. Indeed, in your full post that you now partly quote you refer to JD and TDO as a 'duo', which again seems strange phraseology to use unless you were referring to TDO as a person.
In any case, even if you were accusing the TDO website of lying, then this still doesn't pass muster, since the site had no involvement in production of the document nor in its subsequent use. My colleague Alex was privy to its contents, but
you actually knew about the document before me, because I was not involved in that kind of stuff, as I've pointed out previously.
So the only evidence of 'interference' you have is that TDO was privy to the document and its contents, which would thus mean that YOU were interfering against your council, surely?
Quote:
It is also hard to believe your ignorance of a document published on your server on your web space unless you allow all and sundry FTP access in your name
.
Hardly.
If Alex placed a document on the server but didn't tell me because he knew I wouldn't really be interested or hadn't gotten round to telling me yet, then would that mean that 'all and sundry' had FTP access?
Two people amounts to 'all and sundry'?
Login
Register
FAQ
