Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 12:10 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
alan G wrote:
Has anyone ever had sight of the alleged PM?

Only you. [-X

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
alan G wrote:
This whole matter seems to have evoked a response completely out of proportion to its importance from many at TDO, who I believe, are seeking to divert attention from their own actions and from the real issues involved.

Can't speak for the Bin but I would love to associated with any help that JD gives to anyone that helps them (licensed drivers) get there plate. =D>

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:30 am
Posts: 52
Sussex wrote:
alan G wrote:
This whole matter seems to have evoked a response completely out of proportion to its importance from many at TDO, who I believe, are seeking to divert attention from their own actions and from the real issues involved.

Can't speak for the Bin but I would love to associated with any help that JD gives to anyone that helps them (licensed drivers) get there plate. =D>


That's 'cos you're a "wannabee" but lack the courage or the money to invest in your future, choosing instead to sit on the sidelines and agree with whoever makes the most noise.

Alan G


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
alan G wrote:
That's 'cos you're a "wannabee" but lack the courage or the money to invest in your future, choosing instead to sit on the sidelines and agree with whoever makes the most noise.

Ask the lads in this lot about courage to invest.

No Quantity control.

1. Adur. Have a policy to license WAV only.
2. Amber Valley. Changed policy to quality control July 2004. Error in DFT stats of March 2004.
3. Ashford. Removed restrictions on 3/3/05, quality control.
4. Basildon. Implementing new policy of no restriction 1/4/05 Quality control
5. Bassetlaw. Quality control WAV only.
6. Cardiff. Voted to lift numbers control On 14th January 2003. Implementation prolonged because of a failed court challenge by a vested interest who controls 58 vehicle licences or 12.08% of the fleet of 480.[/b]
7. Castle Point. Changed policy 6/1/03 Quality control.
8. Chelmsford. Decision to lift numbers control made on January 26th 2005. Quality control.
9. Cherwell. Policy changed to Quality control.
10. Conwy. No restriction on numbers, Quality condition Wav only.
11. Copeland. Issuing 4 licences in 2006, 3 in 2007 and totally removing numbers control 1/1/08.
12. Crawley. Lifted numbers control September 2002 Quality Control.
13. Denbighshire. Have lifted restrictions with no stipulation of wav requirement.
14. Durham. In the process of removing restrictions.
15. Easington. Changed policy to quality control in late 2005. Currently considering vehicle types?
16. Eastleigh. Voted on 21/6/05 to remove numbers control in favour of quality control. Effective from 1/7/05
17. East Lindsey Quality control.
18. East Northants. Quality control. Should not have been included in the OFT or DFT restricted statistics. Changed policy March 1997.
19. East Riding. Lifting numbers control on 1/4/05.
20. Fylde. Removed restrictions 8/3/05, Quality control.
21. Gosport. Removed restrictions on16/3/05 Quality control.
22. Great Yarmouth. Voted to remove limit on numbers 22/12/04 Quality control.
23. Guildford. Lifted numbers control in June 2004
24. Gwynedd. Removed restrictions October. Proposing grandfather rights for incumbent proprietors.
25. Harlow. Decision to remove numbers control taken in 12/03. First application 16th Feb 2004.
26. Ipswich. Changed policy on 8/4/05 Quality control.
27. Kerrier. Now Quality control. Should never have been in the OFT or DFT restricted list. Changed policy in 1974.
28. Kettering. Quality control. Implementation 1/4/05
29. Kings Lynn. Survey complete. Committee voted in October to remove Quantity controls.
30. Luton ua. Voted on 8/3/05 to lift quantity control in favour of Quality control, Subject to legal clearance.
31. Merthyr removed restrictions 1/12/04 new policy Quality control.
32. Middlesborough ua Quality control.
33. Mole Valley. Change of policy Feb 2005 from quantity control to quality control.
34. New Forest. Committee voted on 18/9/05 to remove numbers control on 1/4/06. Quality control.
35. North East Lincs UA. Quality control.
36. Reigate and Banstead. 30/6/05 Full council voted to remove restrictions, quality control.
37. Selby. Quality control WAV only.
38. Slough UA. Quality control.
39. Solihul, Voted to lift numbers control on 4/4/05
40. South Bedfordshire. Lifted numbers control on 9/3/05 quality control policy already in place.
41. South Ribble. Resolved to de limit numbers on 7/3/05.
42. Stratford-upon-Avon. De-limited numbers June 2004. Q/C. Error in 2004 DfT T&PH report.
43. Swindon ua. Voted on 20/7/05 to remove quality control in favour of quantity control.
44. Thanet. Decided on 17/5/05 to remove restrictions and also create one Taxi zone. The decision of the council is likely to be challenged by the local taxi trade.
45. Walsall. Removing restrictions 1/4/05 Quality control policy.
46. Watford. Removed quantity controls on 20/10/05 in favour of quality control.
47. West Somerset quality control.
48. Wolverhampton. Removed restrictions late 2005 quality control
49. Woking Gradual lifting of restrictions, quality control, full de limitation in April 2007. Decision to change policy taken Dec 2004. Error in DFT stats of March 2004.
50. Wrexham. Recently removed restrictions on numbers.
51. Wycombe. Policy change July 2004. Quality control, Error in DfT data of March 2004.
52. Wyre Forest. Halcrow survey carried out, paid for by license holders. Decided on 18/5/05 to phase out numbers restrictions by issuing 10 new licenses immediately by ballot, 5 in 2006 and 2007 and completely remove numbers control in 2008.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 12:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
alan G wrote:
Sussex wrote:
alan G wrote:
This whole matter seems to have evoked a response completely out of proportion to its importance from many at TDO, who I believe, are seeking to divert attention from their own actions and from the real issues involved.

Can't speak for the Bin but I would love to associated with any help that JD gives to anyone that helps them (licensed drivers) get there plate. =D>


That's 'cos you're a "wannabee" but lack the courage or the money to invest in your future, choosing instead to sit on the sidelines and agree with whoever makes the most noise.

Alan G

and what exactly have you invested! raffles.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 4:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
alan G wrote:
That's 'cos you're a "wannabee" but lack the courage or the money to invest in your future, choosing instead to sit on the sidelines and agree with whoever makes the most noise.



Rather than 'courage' and 'invest', you might as well say things like 'foolhardiness' and 'throw money down the drain'.

Or at least if you were as confident about the future of restricted numbers and plate values as your post would seem to suggest, then why are you getting your knickers in such a knot about people having their say about it?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 4:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
alan G wrote:

Has anyone ever had sight of the alleged PM? We are supposed to take JDs opinions and deductions as proven when they are not.



Yes, I have, and that's why the evidence points to you finding the document via the private messages. The document per se provides no indication as to whether or when it was sent to the Sheriff Principal, nor that it was authored by JD, but the text of the private message does.

If you'd come across the document by accident (unlikely in itself) then you probably would have posted the link, but just wouldn't have said what you said on your forum at that time. It simply doesn't ring true, unless of course you read the contents of the PM as well, which concurs with what you said on the forum.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 4:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Sussex wrote:
15. Easington. Changed policy to quality control in late 2005. Currently considering vehicle types?
16. Eastleigh. Voted on 21/6/05 to remove numbers control in favour of quality control. Effective from 1/7/05
17. East Lindsey Quality control.
18. East Northants. Quality control. Should not have been included in the OFT or DFT restricted statistics. Changed policy March 1997.
19. East Riding. Lifting numbers control on 1/4/05.



There appears to be one missing from the 'east' list? :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group