Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 11:59 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 247 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 12:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
gusmac wrote:
Shouldn't the new contractor have been aware of his responsibilities?


Generally, yes BUT how would he know this (or any) specific job already had drivers/escorts on it, a new (from scratch) job - like mine - wasn't even in existence prior to me winning it, the kiddy was a new starter

Tenders dont say if a job is new or already running

Then again, what percentage of the UK's HC/PH and escort workforce are PAYE?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
I'd have thought that information would have been provided to anyone as part of the tender process.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
wannabeeahack wrote:
gusmac wrote:
Shouldn't the new contractor have been aware of his responsibilities?


Generally, yes BUT how would he know this (or any) specific job already had drivers/escorts on it, a new (from scratch) job - like mine - wasn't even in existence prior to me winning it, the kiddy was a new starter

Tenders dont say if a job is new or already running

Then again, what percentage of the UK's HC/PH and escort workforce are PAYE?



The simple answer is LCC should clearly state it on the tender.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 12:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
well im on 3 council frameworks, none state if its a current job on tenders, in a way they arent, they end in July (usually) and take an 8 week break

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 12:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
If a winning contractor had 1 weeks notice of a start date and the previous driver was in a neighbouring LA TUPE could scream from the highest hill top but the driver COULDNT be employed by the new contractor when badges can take months, and thats without added problems like medicals, knowledge tests, DBS, DSA/Btec, etc...

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
wannabeeahack wrote:
well im on 3 council frameworks, none state if its a current job on tenders, in a way they arent, they end in July (usually) and take an 8 week break
No expert but I'd say the council have left themselves liable for the hidden costs.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
wannabeeahack wrote:
If a winning contractor had 1 weeks notice of a start date and the previous driver was in a neighbouring LA TUPE could scream from the highest hill top but the driver COULDNT be employed by the new contractor when badges can take months, and thats without added problems like medicals, knowledge tests, DBS, DSA/Btec, etc...
Irrelevant. They would still need to be paid. Not their fault if the winning bidder didn't consider this.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
gusmac wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
If a winning contractor had 1 weeks notice of a start date and the previous driver was in a neighbouring LA TUPE could scream from the highest hill top but the driver COULDNT be employed by the new contractor when badges can take months, and thats without added problems like medicals, knowledge tests, DBS, DSA/Btec, etc...
Irrelevant. They would still need to be paid. Not their fault if the winning bidder didn't consider this.


you may consider it irrelevant, but would you pay them if they couldnt do the job?

good man if you would!

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
It's not optional. You can scream from the highest hill all you like.
These people have rights which won't just go away because you don't like it.

If you were aware when you tendered, more fool you. If not, unless caveat emptor applies, you'd be within your rights to tell the council to shove their contract where the sun don't shine. Or sue them for the hidden costs.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
gusmac wrote:
It's not optional. You can scream from the highest hill all you like.
These people have rights which won't just go away because you don't like it.

If you were aware when you tendered, more fool you. If not, unless caveat emptor applies, you'd be within your rights to tell the council to shove their contract where the sun don't shine. Or sue them for the hidden costs.


doesnt worry me, id never pay anyway....never do...pmsl

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
mind you, if i employ the wife PAYE now and dont tender for the job come july she will have a job for life......lol

well, till kiddy leaves school

or tender so high i KNOW i wont get it

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
wannabeeahack wrote:

BTW, I appreciate that your losing a £120/day contract smarts but thats life im afraid...

I am not concerned with the loss of the contract. I am concerned for the jobs of the staff. After my costs the contract was not worth a vast ammount to me.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
gusmac wrote:
I'd have thought that information would have been provided to anyone as part of the tender process.

Apparently the framework agreement does mention that in some cases TUPE may exist. However it was not mentioned on the tender. As soon as the tender came out I contacted the Council and said that there may be a TUPE issue. The Concil looked ito it and agreed that there was a TUPE issue. The winning tenderer was informed of this and was given the oportunity to recall his tender. He was advised of his obligations under TUPE and was given a copy of the employee contracts which clearly state what the remuneration package is. He still agreed to take on the contract. He then spoke to the employees and offered them different pay and conditions, well actually he told them that they would be self employed and at that stage he didn't know how much they would be paid. He still hasn't told them how much. Obviously he doesn't understand that the employees transfer automatically on the same terms and conditions and he clearly doesn't realise that by not offering the same terms and conditions it is likely to be construtive dismissal and could cost him a small fortune.
As things stand I am probably not in a position to continue with the contract now even if it was offered back to me.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
wannabeeahack wrote:

Grandad, would you accept employees you didnt want on a newly won contract (forced by TUPE) and what happens to your existing employees, do you then sack them, and then they take you to a tribunal?


If I was not aware of the TUPE issue when I won the tender I would considder if I had the right price on the job to take the job on and employ the staff. One thing is certain with the way that we do things it is highly likely that the staff would be employed on BETTER terms than they already had. If I had not got enough money on the tender I would refuse the contract.
Before offering the contract to the winning bidder you are asked if you are happy to accept the contract. You can say no.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 2:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
grandad wrote:
As things stand I am probably not in a position to continue with the contract now even if it was offered back to me.


so.....will you be laying staff off?..... :roll:

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 247 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 240 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group