Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2025 5:26 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Firstly neither is of any benefit to the driver if there isn't enough work for the number of HC licensed, Sussex claims he would decide when and where he would work so little benefit should be expected by the consumer.



If you're saying that requiring a decent vehicle will keep down numbers then this will help ensure adequate work. The point is that offering equality of opportunity is fairer than the arbitrary limits on numbers that you seem to prefer, where the benefit of the reduced numbers ends up as a plate premium, which comes out of the pockets of purchasers and into the pockets of those whose main concern in the trade is to keep others out of it to this end.

I wanted to start my own airline but couldn't afford a jumbo jet, but I don't go around wailing about the fact that this is unfair.

It maybe unfair, as you say, but it's a lot fairer than the current nonsense, and is what usually happens in the real world.

Try asking any member of the public what they think is fairest.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Sussex claims he would decide when and where he would work so little benefit should be expected by the consumer.



I'm not really sure what this has to do with the principle of whether plate premiums or vehicle quality standards are a better way of limiting entry to the trade, perhaps you could explain.

And you can hardly extrapolate what one person would do the whole country even if it did assist the point that you're trying to make, which it doesn't anway.

In any case, I think people deciding when and where to work is widespread in the trade, believe it or not, whether it's qualitative or qauntitative entry that's in place.

I think Sussex works when and where he wants currently in his PH vehicle, and would presumably do the same if he bought a HC plate, or if he got a free one with a WAV!

Incidentally, as someone who's business interests lie outside the trade and who just seems to drive a cab when and where you want, I think you have a hard neck denying others a plate on this basis.

But you've always had a hard neck, since you've had all three plates in Gateshead, but when others want the same thing you call them greedy and tell them that you know best, you're not an angel, you want to play God!!

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Gateshead Angel wrote:
The narrow perspective of the plateholder is, it could be argued, wider than that of those rich enough to purchase a decent WAV. But as you fall into such a category you see the chance to further exploit those who would like a HC but can't afford one.



I'm not quite sure what you're alluding to here, since my area isn't restricted and never has been.

Nevertheless, about 90% plus of owners hire jockies, and they typically earn about £3-4 an hour, and as a point of principle I don't get involved in this since I deem this exploitation, so I don't like your accusation.

But coming back to the principle in question, you don't seem to mind the exploitation of those who can't afford a taxi plate in Brighton (say), indeed at £50k for a decent motor and a plate, you'll understand that that's a bit out of most people's reach.

So perhaps you could tell us how much you think rentals would be in Brighton under the following scenarios:

1 £50k for a decent motor and plate;
2 £20k for a decent WAV.

And having answered that question, which scenrio sees the worst exploiting, that you seem to find so objectionable?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Gateshead Angel wrote:
TDO wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:
You say how can you justify NOT giving a licence to someone who meets the criteria, but I would say let that person drive PH, after all how can you say to a person who has owned his own HC plate that he must either comply with these increased standards or leave the trade. Do you consider that to be fair.



Yes, it's called a level playing field.

An alien concept to you perhaps, but not to people generally.

It's certainly fairer than asking HC drivers to comply with the balooning premiums if they want to enter the trade.


JD, how can your "level playing field" be conducive to the consumer if it excludes people, who are fit and proper, from joining the trade.

Your theory, will not work to the benefit of the driver, unless that driver has the financial stability to obtain or purchase a WAV of the age or quality demanded by the authority.



That was me, not JD, and I refer you to the answer I gave a few moments ago :D

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Gateshead Angel wrote:
Look I'm not saying that all restrictions currently imposed are at even a sane level, to many reports have been posted with ludicrously low HC figures, but this needs to be properly addressed. I think that councils who don't address their policies properly, and choose to derestrict without proper investigation as to what is required are jumping from the frying pan into the fire.

Its pleasing to see that some councils recently are undertaking unmet demand surveys before reviewing their policies, I hope that when the surveys are completed the advised increase is introduced quickly then reviewed on a regular basis.


These surveys are nonsense, if only because if numbers are ludicrously low then they'll stay that way even after a survey.

What happens is that the PH market grows to meet demand, and when surveys take place there's little unmet demand because it's all gone to the PH sector, and and any hail and rank demand that would exist if restrictions had never been imposed just doesn't exist, and since the surveyors just look at ranks serviced by the current HC fleet then they're never going to find that hidden demand.

If you look at surveys in places with ludicrously low numbers you'll see what I mean - they really just endorse the numbers there already.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37473
Location: Wayneistan
I tend to agree with GA,

the point he puts across is basically justification, this works, or should work both ways.

if the argument you put is correct, then surely justification will merely justify your position.

Captain cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:58 am 
TDO wrote:
These surveys are nonsense, if only because if numbers are ludicrously low then they'll stay that way even after a survey.

What happens is that the PH market grows to meet demand, and when surveys take place there's little unmet demand because it's all gone to the PH sector, and and any hail and rank demand that would exist if restrictions had never been imposed just doesn't exist, and since the surveyors just look at ranks serviced by the current HC fleet then they're never going to find that hidden demand.

If you look at surveys in places with ludicrously low numbers you'll see what I mean - they really just endorse the numbers there already.


So lets change the survey format, come up with some suggestions on what should be included.
I for one, would like to see the surveys as an investigation into the needs of the public and should include proposals for new ranks in areas where consumers need them.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56826
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
I for one, would like to see the surveys as an investigation into the needs of the public and should include proposals for new ranks in areas where consumers need them.

They do now, when was the last time you read one? [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
captain cab wrote:
I tend to agree with GA,

the point he puts across is basically justification, this works, or should work both ways.

if the argument you put is correct, then surely justification will merely justify your position.

Captain cab


OK el Capitano, so the survey in Brighton justified the release of 19 plates and 5 a year thereafter.

In the context of the total trade this is clearly a small number, and this is borne out by the fact that during all this plate premiums have been booming.

So how do you justify this, and equally-qualified drivers either being confined to PH or paying huge and increasing rentals to plate holders?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Gateshead Angel wrote:

So lets change the survey format, come up with some suggestions on what should be included.
I for one, would like to see the surveys as an investigation into the needs of the public and should include proposals for new ranks in areas where consumers need them.


The kind of things that the surveys try to measure are unquantifiable, and the those conducting them are clearly clueless about the trade, so as far as I'm concerned they are unreformable.

IMHO all that's needed are a few basic standards for acquiring a badge and plate, that takes care of the quality side and ensures drivers earn a reasonable crust.

Market forces will sort out the rest.

You can only buck markets so far, and you shouldn't compel people to do things, so I would leave it at that.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37473
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
OK el Capitano


ahhh my spanish counterpart :wink:

I dont know enough about Brighton to comment, do they still play at the Goldstone Ground? :wink:

give me more details and I'll pass an opinion.

regards

Captain cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 9:04 am 
TDO wrote:
The kind of things that the surveys try to measure are unquantifiable, and the those conducting them are clearly clueless about the trade, so as far as I'm concerned they are unreformable.


Nothing about assessing demand is "unreformable".

Nothing about proper investigation is unfair.

What we need to do is ensure that the right amount of HC are licensed in each area.

The problem I have is that by just allowing a free for all, by allowing market forces to determine numbers you force some drivers, old and new, into poverty. Then the same people who were calling for fairness and equality state that only the strong should survive, exactly how fair is that.

Lets make an effort to get it right while we have an opportunity to do so. I believe that a few councils are assessing demand I hope they take notice of the survey and I hope the surveys provide good evidence for the right amount of plates to be issued.

Councils that either bury their heads in the sand or let go of the reigns are doing their local community an injustice, I applaud every council that is conducting a survey, every council that is properly evaluating their services, as they are actually properly considering all aspects and my old mate that is what you call fairness.

B. Lucky :twisted:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:49 am 
TDO wrote:
Gateshead Angel wrote:

So lets change the survey format, come up with some suggestions on what should be included.
I for one, would like to see the surveys as an investigation into the needs of the public and should include proposals for new ranks in areas where consumers need them.


The kind of things that the surveys try to measure are unquantifiable, and the those conducting them are clearly clueless about the trade, so as far as I'm concerned they are unreformable.

IMHO all that's needed are a few basic standards for acquiring a badge and plate, that takes care of the quality side and ensures drivers earn a reasonable crust.

Market forces will sort out the rest.

You can only buck markets so far, and you shouldn't compel people to do things, so I would leave it at that.




TDO 8) 8)

How do you ensure a driver earns a reasonable crust, from what I see of your arguments the only person who understants the correct way to evaluate the need for demand is you ,how will marked forces ensure that a driver earns a reasonable crust.
please bear in mind that myself and other people like me are interested in our members now.. 8) 8)


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 3:53 pm 
Mr T.

UNMET DEMAND REPORTS AND SURVEYS have nothing at all to do with drivers wages.

limit by numbers is an enforcement issue, and the reason for it is to ensure that there is enough room in the councils stables to put the impounded horses

thats why modern day survays are a total sham.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56826
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
How do you ensure a driver earns a reasonable crust, from what I see of your arguments the only person who understants the correct way to evaluate the need for demand is you ,how will marked forces ensure that a driver earns a reasonable crust.
please bear in mind that myself and other people like me are interested in our members now.. 8) 8)

The same way as the PH trade earn a crust, by hard work. They don't need flawed restrictions to make a living, just sensible driver and vehicle conditions.

Oh, and they don't need up to £50,000 to start up. Get rid of that cost, and you wont need to worry about earning a crust. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group