echo15 wrote:
"Because you should check that they can pay before you take the booking"
Is he an ex-shareholder yet?
| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| New Shareholder http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10307 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | echo15 [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Shareholder |
Had a new shareholder come in the office to pay the shared running costs "Right heres your money less £10 for the runner I had last week" "Why is a runner the fault of the company?" "Because you should check that they can pay before you take the booking" The last words from the office were"You can ***** off and your a tenner short" |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New Shareholder |
echo15 wrote: "Because you should check that they can pay before you take the booking"
Is he an ex-shareholder yet?
|
|
| Author: | JD [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Playing devils advocate would no doubt make for an interesting debate but I'm not going there. Regards JD |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
JD wrote: Playing devils advocate would no doubt make for an interesting debate but I'm not going there.
Regards JD I will....wtf should the office pay? CC |
|
| Author: | echo15 [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: Is he an ex-shareholder yet?
I wish! 
|
|
| Author: | echo15 [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Her reckoning was as the office took the booking then the office should ensure the punter could pay the fare. Not her driver, the person that acually sees the punter.
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
echo15 wrote: Quote: Is he an ex-shareholder yet? I wish! If he is a shareholder then that means all the other shareholders are paying for his runner. What a  .
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
echo15 wrote: Her reckoning was as the office took the booking then the office should ensure the punter could pay the fare.
Not her driver, the person that acually sees the punter. I suppose an argument could be that with PH the contract is between the operator and the passenger? CC |
|
| Author: | echo15 [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Quote: I suppose an argument could be that with PH the contract is between the operator and the passenger?
But when the punter gets in the car and the driver says "Where to?" and the punter gives the destination isn't there a verbal contract between punter and driver?
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
echo15 wrote: Quote: I suppose an argument could be that with PH the contract is between the operator and the passenger? But when the punter gets in the car and the driver says "Where to?" and the punter gives the destination isn't there a verbal contract between punter and driver? Yes with HC.....no with PH 
CC |
|
| Author: | echo15 [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
We are HC
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
echo15 wrote: We are HC
Well tell the shareholder to feck off
CC |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
if it was booked through a base wasnt a contact number and name taken? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|