Brummie Cabbie wrote:
TDO, I would sent you a postcard from my mini holidays!!!
Can you not buy a digital camera?
| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| If I Had A Postal Address For ..... http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12307 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | If I Had A Postal Address For ..... |
TDO, I would sent you a postcard from my mini holidays!!! |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: If I Had A Postal Address For ..... |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: TDO, I would sent you a postcard from my mini holidays!!!
Can you not buy a digital camera?
|
|
| Author: | Smoked Glass [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Brummie dont be doin a hit an run again, tell us all were your going. We are now all in suspenders! |
|
| Author: | cabbyman [ Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I wonder if it may have a PO postcode. 
|
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: If I Had A Postal Address For ..... |
Sussex wrote: Brummie Cabbie wrote: TDO, I would sent you a postcard from my mini holidays!!! Can you not buy a digital camera? Photography is my hobby ..... when I have the time! And would you believe it with all the rush to leave on Tuesday, I did not take a single camera from my collection. Good job the Missus took hers. |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Smoked Glass wrote: Brummie dont be doin a hit an run again, tell us all were your going. We are now all in suspenders!
We only went to Hayling Island, near Portsmouth where the daughter is at Uni, just about to start her second year. Very nice & peaceful, especially this time of year, but there is a dearth of good eating places on Hayling. |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sat Sep 26, 2009 9:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
BC, im struggling for settings to take moon shots got a canon 400d and a sigma 28mm-300mm lens on a tripod... this was the best - taken at 1600th/sec! (800 ISO) 
|
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sat Sep 26, 2009 9:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
wannabeeahack wrote: BC, im struggling for settings to take moon shots
got a canon 400d and a sigma 28mm-300mm lens on a tripod... this was the best - taken at 1600th/sec! (800 ISO) B*llocks; your taking the p*ss!!! No way do you take a night shot at 1/1600 sec at 800 ISO & get a image like that!!! You forgot to say what F value you took the photo at. I suppose that was something ridiculous like F16 or F22 too. Your image taken even at F1.2 at 1/1600 secs with a 'film speed' of 800 ISO would probably still come out as one big black blob!!! 
|
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i was suprised too, bear in mind that the subject is very bright even though it is night, wont that move the goalposts? other settings i expected to work (faster ISO and/or longer exposures) simply overexposed the lens (at 300mm) is 6.5F |
|
| Author: | bloodnock [ Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
wannabeeahack wrote: i was suprised too, bear in mind that the subject is very bright even though it is night, wont that move the goalposts?
other settings i expected to work (faster ISO and/or longer exposures) simply overexposed the lens (at 300mm) is 6.5F Is it legal to work whilst simply over Exposed??? |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
wannabeeahack wrote: i was suprised too, bear in mind that the subject is very bright even though it is night, wont that move the goalposts?
other settings i expected to work (faster ISO and/or longer exposures) simply overexposed the lens (at 300mm) is 6.5F Are you serious? |
|
| Author: | Smoked Glass [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 9:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: wannabeeahack wrote: i was suprised too, bear in mind that the subject is very bright even though it is night, wont that move the goalposts? other settings i expected to work (faster ISO and/or longer exposures) simply overexposed the lens (at 300mm) is 6.5F Are you serious? 
|
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 9:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Smoked Glass wrote: Now look what youve started. You have rattled there cages now and we are going to get 4 pages of c**p about photography. Who took this & who took that with what?
What a good idea Mr Schmoked Glass; thanks for that!!!! My first camera was a Zorka, what was your wannabe? |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: Smoked Glass wrote: Now look what youve started. You have rattled there cages now and we are going to get 4 pages of c**p about photography. Who took this & who took that with what? What a good idea Mr Schmoked Glass; thanks for that!!!! My first camera was a Zorka, what was your wannabe? Zenit B, them a Zenit E (onboard exposure meter!) Praktica TTL Olympus OM1+motor drive wife/kids/family Nikon AF+motor drive Fujifilm 5500 and now the 400D and yes, i was serious - 28mm/3.8F 300mm/6.5F super zoom (cheapo) |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
look at this guys picture taken at:- Exposure: 1/200 Aperture: f/11 ISO 100 300mm ISO - only ONE hundred AND F11 http://www.flickr.com/photos/cayusa/343 ... 413267488/ |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|