| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Can you believe it? http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12378 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Can you believe it? |
Quote: It said most parents would be exempt but those who babysat for more than two hours at a time, or for more than 14 days per year, should be registered.
The "reward" could be money or free baby-sitting in return, it said. The warning comes after Ofsted told two policewomen to end an arrangement to care for each other's children. According to the Mail on Sunday, Ofsted told two detective constables, Leanne Shepherd, from Milton Keynes, and Lucy Jarrett, from Buckingham, to end their arrangement. What about (say) 2 sisters who swap baby-care duties Its getting beyond a joke Is HMG that desperate to tax everything? (two COPS note) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8277378.stm |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Can you believe it? |
wannabeeahack wrote: Quote: It said most parents would be exempt but those who babysat for more than two hours at a time, or for more than 14 days per year, should be registered. The "reward" could be money or free baby-sitting in return, it said. The warning comes after Ofsted told two policewomen to end an arrangement to care for each other's children. According to the Mail on Sunday, Ofsted told two detective constables, Leanne Shepherd, from Milton Keynes, and Lucy Jarrett, from Buckingham, to end their arrangement. What about (say) 2 sisters who swap baby-care duties Its getting beyond a joke Is HMG that desperate to tax everything? (two COPS note) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8277378.stm No. But then the quote from Ofsted, ' Reward is not just a case of money changing hands. The supply of services or goods and, in some circumstances, reciprocal arrangements can also constitute reward', should be used by all licensing officers when interpreting driving & carrying passengers for reward! |
|
| Author: | cabbyman [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Roll on the general election. There was more freedom under the KGB and Stahzi(sp?), ffs! |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
cabbyman wrote: Roll on the general election. There was more freedom under the KGB and Stahzi(sp?), ffs!
NKVD were the best of the bunch!! |
|
| Author: | skippy41 [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
FFS there must be around 20% of the population that does that while the mum goes to work or gran or grandad or other members of family looks after the ankle biters, if they didn't there would be more on the dole |
|
| Author: | cabbyman [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Petition: http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/reciprocalcc/ |
|
| Author: | Saltmarket [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: cabbyman wrote: Roll on the general election. There was more freedom under the KGB and Stahzi(sp?), ffs! NKVD were the best of the bunch!! Never! Beria was just misunderstood!
|
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skippy41 wrote: FFS there must be around 20% of the population that does that while the mum goes to work or gran or grandad or other members of family looks after the ankle biters, if they didn't there would be more on the dole
Read the article & it says the ones you mention are exempt. It's friends helping friends out that is in question. Perhaps if the friend that was minding the children paid the parent for the privilege of child-minding, it might just f*ck these jobsworths. |
|
| Author: | Saltmarket [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: skippy41 wrote: FFS there must be around 20% of the population that does that while the mum goes to work or gran or grandad or other members of family looks after the ankle biters, if they didn't there would be more on the dole Read the article & it says the ones you mention are exempt. It's friends helping friends out that is in question. Perhaps if the friend that was minding the children paid the parent for the privilege of child-minding, it might just f*ck these jobsworths. Wouldn't they try to class that as taxable income, though? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|