If the signage only says taxis and not licenced taxis only, what is he doing wrong its clearly a taxi all be it not a licenced one
Get it up them Noel
| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| A FARE COP, NOEL http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12550 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | captain cab [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | A FARE COP, NOEL |
A FARE COP, NOEL NABBED: Edmonds drives his unlicensed taxi cab ILLEGALLY in bus lane Here's Noel Edmonds pulling a fast one... driving along a bus lane in his very own taxi. The Deal Or No Deal star bought it for a few hundred pounds so he does not have to crawl through rush-hour traffic like other frustrated motorists. But Noel could soon be picking up £60-a-time fines every time he slips into a bus lane. For only LICENSED taxis can use bus lanes at any time - and Noel's has not been registered since 2007 He's also added a jokey message, Action Against Time Thieves on the taxi's pretend cabbie plate, making clear his feelings about traffic jams. Staff at the Bristol studios where Deal or No Deal is filmed say Noel, who is worth more than £70million, only bought the taxi to cut the fivemile journey to and from his £2m mansion in Gloucestershire. "He's quite blatant about using the bus lanes," said a show insider. "It's not as if he just dips in and out of the bus lanes, he drives in them whenever he can, and only joins normal traffic if there isn't one. He looks a bit like a cabbie by wrapping up in a scarf and fleece, always pulling both of the taxi visors down and wearing a pair of sunglasses." On three days last week, we caught Edmonds, 60, driving in bus lanes FOUR TIMES, which could have cost him £240 in potential fines. In fact he barely ever drove in the same lanes as other cars. On Tuesday night Edmonds left work at the studio just after 6pm. As soon as he turned on to the main road he dipped straight into a bus lane. Clearly visible signs show the lane should only be used by buses until 6.30pm, although taxis, scooters and cyclists can also use them. When the lane ended Edmonds had to sit in traffic for a quarter of a mile on the A4 on his way home as there were no bus lanes. But as soon as the next one appeared he nipped into it, even though it was banned to private cars 24 hours a day. On Wednesday evening Edmonds again drove in the bus lane with the 24-hour-a-day ban. On Thursday Edmonds left home at 8.10am and drove to work using another bus lane closed to normal traffic from 7am to 10am. A spokesman for the Licensed Taxi Drivers' Association said: "Someone who has got a fake licence as a joke is not committing any crime. "But if it's done with the intention to deceive, that's an offence. Edmonds would have incurred a £60 fine each time he went in a bus lane, and seems to be driving a very old taxi not worth more than £200.Licensed taxi drivers don't drive them any more because they belched out so much pollution, unless the engine is rebuilt." Edmonds is said to earn £3m a year for Deal or No Deal and is renowned for his love of fast cars and dislike of authority. In 2006 he ran into trouble after boasting how he drove at 186mph while in the nude. More recently he said he had refused to pay his TV licence fee because of the quality of BBC broadcasting. In July he married his third wife, make-up artist Liz Davies Last night Noel's spokesman admitted he did drive a cab in bus lanes but did so as part of a one-man crusade against time-wasters. He said: "The licence plate says Action Against Time-Thieves and Noel believes that bus lanes are one way it happens. "Noel doesn't pick up fares, although a lady did once try to get into the cab at the local rail station and was very surprised." The number on the hackney carriage licence - 6106 - was the date he met wife Liz, on January 6, 2006, and was not an attempt to pass himself off as a genuine cabbie. He added that Noel had never received a bus lane fine , but if he did he would "look very hard at it". |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I hope the authorities give him a NO DEAL court summons instead. There's bound to be something they can summons him on instead of just a ticket. Deception perhaps. |
|
| Author: | skippy41 [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
If the signage only says taxis and not licenced taxis only, what is he doing wrong its clearly a taxi all be it not a licenced one
Get it up them Noel
|
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skippy41 wrote: If the signage only says taxis and not licenced taxis only, what is he doing wrong its clearly a taxi all be it not a licenced one
Get it up them Noel OK Mr Skippy41, we'll all buy a bus then for SDP & use the bus lane. |
|
| Author: | skippy41 [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: skippy41 wrote: If the signage only says taxis and not licenced taxis only, what is he doing wrong its clearly a taxi all be it not a licenced one Get it up them Noel OK Mr Skippy41, we'll all by a bus then for SDP & use the bus lane. Brum, Noel is clearly sticking to the signage rules, if the sign says taxis only, and that's what he is driving according to his log book, what law is he breaking, he has found the loophole, regardless of if its licenced or not, If I travel down south and there is a bus lane I use it, |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skippy41 wrote: Brummie Cabbie wrote: skippy41 wrote: If the signage only says taxis and not licenced taxis only, what is he doing wrong its clearly a taxi all be it not a licenced one Get it up them Noel OK Mr Skippy41, we'll all by a bus then for SDP & use the bus lane. Brum, Noel is clearly sticking to the signage rules, if the sign says taxis only, and that's what he is driving according to his log book, what law is he breaking, he has found the loophole, regardless of if its licenced or not, If I travel down south and there is a bus lane I use it, It's likely that the TRO for the bus lane will stipulate licensed taxi, but we'll all keep an eye on this story to see how it develops. If you take you're argument to the extreme, then anyone driving a bus or taxi for SDP would be able to use the bus lanes & that's not what was intended in the legislation. |
|
| Author: | Saltmarket [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: skippy41 wrote: Brummie Cabbie wrote: skippy41 wrote: If the signage only says taxis and not licenced taxis only, what is he doing wrong its clearly a taxi all be it not a licenced one Get it up them Noel OK Mr Skippy41, we'll all by a bus then for SDP & use the bus lane. Brum, Noel is clearly sticking to the signage rules, if the sign says taxis only, and that's what he is driving according to his log book, what law is he breaking, he has found the loophole, regardless of if its licenced or not, If I travel down south and there is a bus lane I use it, It's likely that the TRO for the bus lane will stipulate licensed taxi, but we'll all keep an eye on this story to see how it develops. If you take you're argument to the extreme, then anyone driving a bus or taxi for SDP would be able to use the bus lanes & that's not what was intended in the legislation. Obviously what Noel Edmonds is doing is making very clever use of definitions. Ask anyone what he drives and they'll say a taxi. That's what the signs say; Buses and Taxis Only. The reason they aren't prosecuting him is because if it got to court they would have to re-do all their signs or re-write the TRO's |
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Does it state "taxi" on the registration document? If not, it is only a taxi when licensed as such. |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: skippy41 wrote: If the signage only says taxis and not licenced taxis only, what is he doing wrong its clearly a taxi all be it not a licenced one Get it up them Noel OK Mr Skippy41, we'll all by a bus then for SDP & use the bus lane. got one already... |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
OK, the tight git may be pulling a fast one, BUT, dont you just love it when the gimp who came up with a rule gets it wrong? the layby heading towards BHX has had a sign put up "no waiting for taxis" - so the PH who park there could argue they are in the right.....lol |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
wannabeeahack wrote: the layby heading towards BHX has had a sign put up "no waiting for taxis" - so the PH who park there could argue they are in the right.....lol
I'll have a look at that tomorrow morning! But isn't it already double red lines? |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: wannabeeahack wrote: the layby heading towards BHX has had a sign put up "no waiting for taxis" - so the PH who park there could argue they are in the right.....lol I'll have a look at that tomorrow morning! But isn't it already double red lines? probably, i was at the front a few weeks ago and heard a cop siren at the back of the queue, so went.....lol why put a sign up if its a red route/no stopping?... |
|
| Author: | skippy41 [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-storie ... -21737970/ Yes definitely a hackney carriage 
And in bloody good nick as well |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skippy41 wrote: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/10/11/a-fare-cop-noel-115875-21737970/
Yes definitely a hackney carriage And in bloody good nick as well I thought wing mirrors were illegal now. And what a good plan showing his number plate ..... so all the nutters can target him!! |
|
| Author: | jimbo [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
skippy41 wrote: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/10/11/a-fare-cop-noel-115875-21737970/
Yes definitely a hackney carriage And in bloody good nick as well The log book will state PLG, not Taxi. Wrong again, Skippy. It's not a Taxi unless it's LICENCED as a Taxi. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|