Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

The Railway Unions first year
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=13684
Page 1 of 2

Author:  GBC [ Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:08 am ]
Post subject:  The Railway Unions first year

I think the time is right to have a look at the RMT London taxi branch, as they seem to be collecting quite a backlog of gaffs and blunders on their way to isolation, obscurity, and eventual disbandment!

The RMT never miss an opportunity to mete out criticism, and expend most of their energy in a negative way. It’s beginning to look like they only support issues that they themselves have decided are in the best interest of the betterment of their own cause.

Their only real achievement has been to develop a tribal culture among trade organisations, pitting cab driver against cab driver and creating animosity within our trade.

They have made numerous attacks on various figures in our trade in an attempt to undermine their positions, in a cheap effort to manipulate cab drivers opinions to swell their membership figures and placate their own sad little egos.

Internet propaganda is their weapon of choice, ( :lol: ) as it doubles as a psychological tool for manipulation purposes and can also be used as blunt instrument to cosh anyone that gets in their way.
The few dedicated members the RMT London taxi branch have are convinced that their beliefs are righteous, and the methods they have adopted are justified.
They view other trade organisations as rivals, and treat them as so; they constantly make vicious and divisive comments on the internet, then they have the audacity to complain that the members of these organisations will not support initiatives that they are known to be part of!

So let’s have a little peek at the RMT’s last 12 months in business:


A committee member stands down after a fracas in the street and embarrassing disclosures of his involvement to an online minicab booking website.

An unsuccessful stalking campaign targetting Bob Oddy, General Secretary of the LTDA, resulting in the police being called.

A chairman who is as elusive as Howard Hughes, who has a regular spot in Callsign mag . The DaC board of management openly accept PH as a legitimate business partners! (The RMT have been known to use the expression, "guilty by association." I wonder if their own chairman qualifies.)

Numerous copy and paste campaigns that never receive replies.
Urinate in a bottle demo, and I’m told the bottle of choice after much debate at a monthly meeting of the RMT was an old style glass coke bottle. It was chosen because you can hold the neck easily with two fingers and the opening is generous, for ease of access!

A vice chairman who gets his picture in the paper for a demonstration that has nothing to do with the cab trade. A man that complains about everything and anyone in a position he could never attain. In fact truth be told, Bob Oddy has a better statistic for turning out on night-time cab trade issues affecting drivers than this long distance activist!

A joint venture with the GMB, seeking a public enquiry into the PCO, and the need for partitions in PH vehicles to enhance the safety of mini-cab drivers.

RMT 40 hour a week working directive.

A Rep at the airport who wants to sue the world. ( :D Wonder who?)

And to top it all, the editor in chief of their own propaganda website TTT, tweets away on twitter about the replacement marshals at Tiger Tiger being a waste of time, space and money; without noticing one of them in fact is a member of his own organisation, the RMT! The very union that has been bleating and belly-aching about the lack of organisation at this venue. The new marshals allowed a Lorry to park, unchallenged on the rank at Tiger Tiger, while they drank tea in the back of their own cab parked at the head of the rank!


On a more serious note, I would like to say a little about Mr John Mason:
The appointment of John Mason as the (Director of Taxi and PH) is the first of its kind at the PCO, and in my opinion, probably the best thing that has happened in its long history.
Finally we have a person in charge with not only business acumen, he also has strong administrative skills. In a relatively short time in office Mr Mason has made bold and concerted efforts to make changes to our industry that his predecessors never had the notion nor inclination to do. Mr Mason is the right man, at the right time that we need desperately to help us bring our industry into this century!

It’s looking very much like the RMT are done licking their wounds after Mr Mason’s recognition rebuttal. Once again the RMT fail to embrace the need for change, and have started more nastiness, as conflict is the ONLY thing they understand. First the accusations of incompetence, no doubt will be followed up by some sort of character assassination. They do love a bogie-man in the closet to complain about!

If you had a problem and you had to attend the Public Carriage Office, would you really want to be represented by people like these?







Not me. :wink:



Re-produced with permission from the NissenHut Blog spot.

Author:  Sussex [ Fri Mar 19, 2010 8:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Railway Unions first year

GBC wrote:
Their only real achievement has been to develop a tribal culture among trade organisations, pitting cab driver against cab driver and creating animosity within our trade.


A joint venture with the GMB, seeking a public enquiry into the PCO, and the need for partitions in PH vehicles to enhance the safety of mini-cab drivers.

So in one paragraph they are being berated for creating animosity with the cab trade, and in the next being berated for dealing with a union that has more cab drivers (nationally) in it than any London body other than the LTDA! :?

Methinks some folks need to take their blinkers off.

Author:  GBC [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:58 am ]
Post subject: 

You mean dealing with the London Minicab Union?

The GMB don't, and never have represented Licensed London Taxi drivers.

I think the above article is an accurate portrayal, all you get from the RMT (Railways or the taxi section) is 100% negativity.
Thats why the travelling public hate them.

Lots of so called problems flagged up, but no solutions by this so called 'almighty' transport union.

Author:  grandad [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:40 am ]
Post subject: 

Hello, pot and kettle spring to mind here. You say that the RMT are just negative and your comments are all negative. Where are your positives?

Author:  Sussex [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:17 am ]
Post subject: 

GBC wrote:
You mean dealing with the London Minicab Union?

If it ensured improved safety and/or better working conditions for the trade I would deal with anyone.

Doing otherwise is just plain stupid.

Author:  GBC [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

grandad wrote:
Hello, pot and kettle spring to mind here. You say that the RMT are just negative and your comments are all negative. Where are your positives?


And who gives a hoot what an unlicensed Limo rep thinks? :?

Author:  GBC [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:23 pm ]
Post subject: 

Sussex wrote:
GBC wrote:
You mean dealing with the London Minicab Union?

If it ensured improved safety and/or better working conditions for the trade I would deal with anyone.

Doing otherwise is just plain stupid.



Perhaps if the GMB London representative spent more time doing just that instead of calling for the Royal Family to be toppled, they may just gain something that would improve everyone's situation.

50'000 pretend London Taxis all working 12 hours a day, 7 days a week for tuppence ha'penny . . .

That must be progress.

Author:  edders23 [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

Meeowww shame Mr flannagan isn't on here anymore a good handbag flailing contest would be most entertaining :lol:


No seriously though I think the GMB side ought to be allowed to address the issues raised the OP is from a heavily biased viewpoint

Author:  toots [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:50 pm ]
Post subject: 

GBC wrote:
grandad wrote:
Hello, pot and kettle spring to mind here. You say that the RMT are just negative and your comments are all negative. Where are your positives?


And who gives a hoot what an unlicensed Limo rep thinks? :?


Who gives a hoot what a London cabbie thinks when their only concern is themselves and the trade in London.

I say good luck to anybody who tries to improve the situation for drivers of all kinds of vehicles that provide service to the travelling public. As far as I am aware the RMT have done quite well for the train drivers so maybe given time and a bit more experience of the trade they will do well for taxi/ph drivers too

Author:  captain cab [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

toots wrote:

I say good luck to anybody who tries to improve the situation for drivers of all kinds of vehicles that provide service to the travelling public. As far as I am aware the RMT have done quite well for the train drivers so maybe given time and a bit more experience of the trade they will do well for taxi/ph drivers too


I trust when the RMT strike this coming easter the RMT taxi members will join them?

I wont hold my breath on that one.

CC

Author:  Sussex [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

GBC wrote:
Perhaps if the GMB London representative spent more time doing just that instead of calling for the Royal Family to be toppled, they may just gain something that would improve everyone's situation.

50'000 pretend London Taxis all working 12 hours a day, 7 days a week for tuppence ha'penny . . .

That must be progress.

Indeed there is a lot to be done, and maybe if people concentrated on the issues that really effect the trade, then they might have a few more friends in the trade.

And maybe heaven forbid a few more members.

Author:  Sussex [ Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:54 pm ]
Post subject: 

captain cab wrote:
I trust when the RMT strike this coming easter the RMT taxi members will join them?

No f***ing chance. :sad:

Author:  GBC [ Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:34 am ]
Post subject: 

toots wrote:
GBC wrote:
grandad wrote:
Hello, pot and kettle spring to mind here. You say that the RMT are just negative and your comments are all negative. Where are your positives?


And who gives a hoot what an unlicensed Limo rep thinks? :?


Who gives a hoot what a London cabbie thinks when their only concern is themselves and the trade in London.




You're quite right, strangely enough the London trade is my only concern.

Can't think why.

Author:  GBC [ Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:39 am ]
Post subject: 

captain cab wrote:

I trust when the RMT strike this coming easter the RMT taxi members will join them?

I wont hold my breath on that one.

CC



I doubt it.

As one section strikes, another takes advantage and makes money.

You couldn't make it up.

Same union, same leader, same subscriptions. When I was in a Union (many moons ago) that would have been called scabbing. :?

Author:  grandad [ Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:52 am ]
Post subject: 

GBC wrote:
grandad wrote:
Hello, pot and kettle spring to mind here. You say that the RMT are just negative and your comments are all negative. Where are your positives?


And who gives a hoot what an unlicensed Limo rep thinks? :?


Firstly I am licensed and secondly I am not a rep.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/