Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

I don't know if this is a good idea, but how about . . .
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=13889		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Brummie Cabbie [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:07 pm ]
Post subject:  I don't know if this is a good idea, but how about . . .
. . . on second thoughts, it's not a good idea!!
Author:  toots [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:25 pm ]
Post subject: 
How do you know if you don't say :?
Author:  grandad [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:33 pm ]
Post subject: 
The lengths that some folke will go to just to make another post. :roll: :mrgreen:
Author:  Stationtone [ Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
Skippy is right brum s got it bad :lol:
Author:  Brummie Cabbie [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 1:08 am ]
Post subject: 
I'll tell you what I thought then, but for obvious reasons, I still don't think it's a good idea.

TDO admin is currently running a poll on the General Election topic to see how the 'good folks of TDO' might vote.

On a different topic in the last day or so, might even have been today, there was a discussion on the level of earnings, or not, of a driver & I think Ms Toots was involved in the posts.

My idea, and I still don't think it's a good one for reasons that will become obvious, was for TDO to run a anonymous poll, just like the General Election poll, on driver's average weekly takings.

The poll could have many different levels of takings, say in blocks of £200, for instance;

Below £200 pw
£200-£400 pw
£400-£600 pw
£600-£800 pw
£800£1,000 pw
Over £1,000pw.

But as I wrote, in hindsight it's not a good idea. In any case London drivers IMO would have to be excluded, as their earnings would obviously distort the results.

Now you all know what I was thinking when I posted, ' I don't know if this is a good idea, but how about . . .
Author:  Brummie Cabbie [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 1:12 am ]
Post subject: 
stationtone wrote:
Skippy is right brum s got it bad :lol:

BTW where's Skippy in all this?

Should have gone to Specsavers!!

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Author:  grandad [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:20 am ]
Post subject: 
So why continue with the post?
Author:  Brummie Cabbie [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:36 am ]
Post subject: 
grandad wrote:
So why continue with the post?

For a number of reasons, including transparency & the hope that the idea might get support.

:oops:
Author:  bloodnock [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 8:15 am ]
Post subject: 
Not a great Idea....the Tax man might take to much of an Interest and if anyone should get overly excited with their declared takings then it might come back and bite them.....Nothing is safe from the all seeing Tax man, least of all the Internet. :shock:
Author:  Brummie Cabbie [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:07 am ]
Post subject: 
bloodnock wrote:
Not a great Idea....the Tax man might take to much of an Interest and if anyone should get overly excited with their declared takings then it might come back and bite them.....Nothing is safe from the all seeing Tax man, least of all the Internet. :shock:

That's exactly what I thought on reflection.
Author:  grandad [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:16 am ]
Post subject: 
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
grandad wrote:
So why continue with the post?

For a number of reasons, including transparency & the hope that the idea might get support.

:oops:


What I meant was, when you realised that it was not a good idea, why did you simply not press the submit button?
Author:  Brummie Cabbie [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:27 am ]
Post subject: 
grandad wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
grandad wrote:
So why continue with the post?

For a number of reasons, including transparency & the hope that the idea might get support.

:oops:

What I meant was, when you realised that it was not a good idea, why did you simply not press the submit button?


Image
Author:  Sussex [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 6:32 pm ]
Post subject: 
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
But as I wrote, in hindsight it's not a good idea. In any case London drivers IMO would have to be excluded, as their earnings would obviously distort the results.

Now you all know what I was thinking when I posted, ' I don't know if this is a good idea, but how about . . .

Do we want the powers that be to get a truer account of our earnings than maybe they see in January? :shock:

And do we want the 2 million unemployed to get any ideas? :sad: :sad:
Author:  bloodnock [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:37 pm ]
Post subject: 
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
But as I wrote, in hindsight it's not a good idea. In any case London drivers IMO would have to be excluded, as their earnings would obviously distort the results.

Now you all know what I was thinking when I posted, ' I don't know if this is a good idea, but how about . . .

Do we want the powers that be to get a truer account of our earnings than maybe they see in January? :shock:

And do we want the 2 million unemployed to get any ideas? :sad: :sad:


Shhhhhhh!! God forbid....we cant be having the 2 million locals finding work..the last time 2 Million jobs were created in the uk 95% of them went to EU migrants.
Author:  captain cab [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
BTW where's Skippy in all this?


Possibly because you didnt mention discount or knackerd skoda gearboxes, or of course......nuclear powered metrocab prototypes.

CC
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/