Gateshead Angel wrote:
oh aye and just for an old chestnut members knew who was involved in the site as we all posted under our real names, something you haven't got the balls to do.
Not having the courage of your convictions is something that is apparent to everyone.
B. Lucky
Well I'm obviously not as big and brave as you Mick, but remember that it's a bit easier to defend the status quo than criticise it. I would have no hesitation in using my name if I was just spouting the usual PHM-type message, but I prefer to say what I think, not what others want me to.
Anyway, and on the subject of TTF, didn't you change your mind about anonymity after your 'incident' arising from what you posted on the forum? Yet something else conveniently forgotten I suspect.
Funny that you have also sent us PMs and emails in the past objecting to your name appearing on here, a name that you yourself typed in before you thought better of it MR GATESHEAD ANGEL
Yet again another point I raised withing the past week or two, ignored by yourself, then conveniently raised again now!
By the way, 95%+ of the trade don't worry me, and in fact they probably wouldn't say 'boo' to me, but it's the tiny minority of clowns that worry me.
Of course, some things never change, and take a look at the reply I gave to Yorkie on TTF about two and a half years ago - no doubt you ignored that then as well!:
Yorkie wrote:
whats more the people doing the bashing are doing so behind dustbins and from anonymity, if you cannot see it Alan, you yourself are holding a knife!:
Dusty Bin wrote:
Not that old chestnut. That one usually comes up when people can't make a good argument. Can't you think of something original Geoff?
The reason for anonymity is that I don't want the sickos in my manor torching my car or baseball batting me etc. That's the real sickos Geoff, not the ones who you deem a sicko because you disagree with them.
Stick to the issues, if you can.:
So no change there then
Login
Register
FAQ
