Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 5:52 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 7:19 am 
How chief taxman's 'cave-in' let Vodaphone off £6bn bill

Controversial tax boss Dave Hartnett agreed a deal to let Vodafone off a £6billion tax bill, it emerged yesterday.

In what was described as an ‘unbelievable cave-in’, the HMRC’s permanent secretary for tax allowed the phone giant to avoid paying vast amounts of tax on profits racked up by a subsidiary based in a tax haven.

The disclosure comes after it emerged that Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs had undercharged 1.4million Britons a total of £2billion in tax and would be claiming it back. Last week Mr Hartnett was forced by Chancellor George Osborne to issue a grovelling apology.

The agreement between HMRC and Vodafone came after negotiations between revenue officers and John Connors, Vodafone’s head of tax. Until 2007, Mr Connors was a senior official at HMRC, where he worked closely with Mr Hartnett.

The saga began a decade ago when Vodafone bought German engineering firm Mannesmann for 180billion euros.

Wanting to route the purchase through an offshore company to avoid paying UK taxes, it set up a subsidiary in Luxemburg where profits would be taxed at less than 1 per cent. But it was ruled that the deal broke anti-tax avoidance rules.

Nevertheless, Mr Hartnett took the Vodafone case away from his team of lawyers and gave it to another negotiating team, which said the phone company could get away with paying a lump sum of £800,000 and a further £450,000 over five years.

HMRC also agreed that the firm would no longer have to pay tax on its Luxembourg subsidiary’s profits. The deal is understood to include some other tax avoidance ruses by Vodafone.

One former HMRC chief told Private Eye magazine the deal was an ‘unbelievable cave-in’.

An HMRC spokesman said: ‘Our legal obligation to maintain customer confidentiality means we are unable to offer comment on the tax affairs of named individuals or organisations.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z0zogrLJqZ

It's OK for some ain't it??


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 1357
Location: grangemouth
Quote:
The agreement between HMRC and Vodafone came after negotiations between revenue officers and John Connors, Vodafone’s head of tax. Until 2007, Mr Connors was a senior official at HMRC, where he worked closely with Mr Hartnett.


more not what, but who, you know.

Quote:
Nevertheless, Mr Hartnett took the Vodafone case away from his team of lawyers and gave it to another negotiating team, which said the phone company could get away with paying a lump sum of £800,000 and a further £450,000 over five years.


more old pals?

Quote:
An HMRC spokesman said: ‘Our legal obligation to maintain customer confidentiality means we are unable to offer comment on the tax affairs of named individuals or organisations.’


I'm sure it hasn't stopped them before.


I wonder how much went to Tory HQ (from voda) in the lead up to the election.

_________________
My heart is heavy, but my consience clear,
I voted Yes, without any fear.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 204 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group