Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 11:05 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
HACKNEY CARRIAGE DRIVERS A and B

The Chairman welcomed all present to the meeting and advised on the remit of the Licensing Panel in determining this matter. The Panel would have to determine whether, given the evidence before them both written and verbal, the drivers remained fit and proper persons to hold Hackney Carriage Driving Licences. Prior to the commencement of the meeting, the Licensing and Litigation Lawyer had also had an opportunity to advise both drivers on matters of procedure and the remit of the Panel.

The Panel gave consideration to the confidential report of the Director of Services that gave details of an incident between the two Licensed Hackney Carriage Drivers at ******* Train station that had been witnessed by a member of the public. The witness was not present at the meeting but both drivers had been given the opportunity to submit questions to the witness, which had been declined by both drivers.

The Panel heard evidence from both drivers and their representatives as well as two character witnesses for Licensed Hackney Carriage Driver B.

The Panel retired to consider the merits of the case.

There were three options available to the Panel; these were to suspend or revoke the drivers licences or to award penalty points. Taking into account all facts contained within the report and the verbal evidence provided by the drivers, the Panel took the decision that the behaviour of both drivers was unacceptable but it did not warrant the revocation of either Licence.

The drivers were awarded 4 and 6 points respectively, in accordance with condition 43 of the points scheme. These points were placed on their Hackney Carriage Driver’s Licences and would remain for a period of 12 months. The purpose of the scheme was to record misdemeanours and to act as a record of the driver's behaviour and conduct so as to ascertain whether they remained a fit and proper person to hold the relevant licence.

RESOLVED: That

1) 4 Penalty Points be awarded to Hackney Carriage Driver A; and

2) 6 Penalty Points be awarded to Hackney Carriage Driver B.


(This matter was considered exempt from publication by virtue of Paragraphs 1, 3 and 7 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972, as amended).

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
Are you saying without the penalty points system no action would have taken place?

Or are you saying a suspension or revocation is the better option?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 8:58 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Plymouth
I just wonder if this all happened in area 1 or area 2. :wink:

_________________
Chris The Fish

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdlyi5mc ... re=related


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
Are you saying without the penalty points system no action would have taken place?

Or are you saying a suspension or revocation is the better option?


I'm saying the whole thing is stupid.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: yes
PostPosted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1364
Location: Liverpool
captain cab wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Are you saying without the penalty points system no action would have taken place?

Or are you saying a suspension or revocation is the better option?


I'm saying the whole thing is stupid.

CC


Yes and I agree.

and no right of appeal i bet

_________________
C. Oakes


The Hackney Association Ltd
bbha@btinternet.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 247 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group