| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| Are you darn sarf? Chelsea/Arsenal/Spurs/Hammers fan? http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=16815 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Fri May 20, 2011 12:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Are you darn sarf? Chelsea/Arsenal/Spurs/Hammers fan? |
|
|
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Fri May 20, 2011 3:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Are you darn sarf? Chelsea/Arsenal/Spurs/Hammers fan? |
wannabeeahack wrote: :lol:
I like that!! |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Fri May 20, 2011 9:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
the silence (from the london area) is, for once, deafening |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sat May 21, 2011 8:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
wannabeeahack wrote: the silence (from the london area) is, for once, deafening
Don't think this Arsenal fan is too happy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQYob9E0q-Y |
|
| Author: | edders23 [ Sat May 21, 2011 6:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Good season for the London mob don't see what they have to moan about 2nd 4th and 5th in the premiership and West ham back where they belong it's all about taking part winning trophies is the perogative of the manchester clubs |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sat May 21, 2011 6:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
2nd place is just first loser BUT, shall we start laying bets who the footballer is taking twitter to court over a super injuction? no clues Quote: The player, who an injunction says can only be identified as CTB, is taking action against ex-Big Brother star Imogen Thomas and the Sun newspaper.
Beckham Rooney Gerard Lampard Crouch |
|
| Author: | toots [ Sat May 21, 2011 7:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
wannabeeahack wrote: 2nd place is just first loser
BUT, shall we start laying bets who the footballer is taking twitter to court over a super injuction? no clues Quote: The player, who an injunction says can only be identified as CTB, is taking action against ex-Big Brother star Imogen Thomas and the Sun newspaper. Beckham Rooney Gerard Lampard Crouch Personally I don't think it's anybody elses business other than those involved. Whilst people are happy to speculate they have no consideration to the damage done to innocent parties. This of course may be a different matter if it effects somebodys judgement if they have high profile important jobs or work within our national security agencies or such like |
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sat May 21, 2011 8:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
toots wrote: wannabeeahack wrote: 2nd place is just first loser BUT, shall we start laying bets who the footballer is taking twitter to court over a super injuction? no clues Quote: The player, who an injunction says can only be identified as CTB, is taking action against ex-Big Brother star Imogen Thomas and the Sun newspaper. Beckham Rooney Gerard Lampard Crouch Personally I don't think it's anybody elses business other than those involved. Whilst people are happy to speculate they have no consideration to the damage done to innocent parties. I don't believe the truth should be suppressed by the courts, for no other reason than to protect the reputations of consenting adults, who knew what they were doing and did so willingly. They made their beds and they should lie in them. Personally, I couldn't give a toss who's banging who. But aren't these super injunctions the cause of all the speculation, and therefore any damage caused to the innocent? |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sat May 21, 2011 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I reckon its Rooney, if it is his missus will string him up |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sat May 21, 2011 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Toots said:- Quote: Personally I don't think it's anybody elses business other than those involved. Whilst people are happy to speculate they have no consideration to the damage done to innocent parties.
the guilty party (him) wasnt bothered about the innocent party (wife? kids?) whilst playing away was he... |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sat May 21, 2011 9:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
wannabeeahack wrote: BUT, shall we start laying bets who the footballer is taking twitter to court over a super injuction?
Well you must be the only mush that doesn't know. 
Why not google Imogen Thomas Twitter? |
|
| Author: | edders23 [ Sat May 21, 2011 10:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Superinjunctioons exist for one purpose only to protect the egos of overpaid Sportsmen/bankers or politicians and specuasltion or even showing an interest is simply feeding that ego Anybody daft enough to marry an overpaid egotripper knows full well that being cheated on is part of the deal NOW back to the thread too many brummy clubs in the premier league for my liking so heres hoping Blackpool and wigan win and Wolves and Burmingham go down to join the hapless hammers ! |
|
| Author: | GBC [ Sun May 22, 2011 3:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
wannabeeahack wrote: the silence (from the london area) is, for once, deafening
You won't get any football comments or opinions from me, I loath football. The only interest in Footie that I have, is when the London clubs are playing, and hundreds of taxis are off the road because their drivers are football mad. Then I'm interested! |
|
| Author: | wannabeeahack [ Sun May 22, 2011 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sussex wrote: wannabeeahack wrote: BUT, shall we start laying bets who the footballer is taking twitter to court over a super injuction? Well you must be the only mush that doesn't know. Why not google Imogen Thomas Twitter? theres lovely look you.... |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sun May 22, 2011 5:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Or of course you could look at the front page of the Scottish Herald.
And it's not the Lone Ranger.
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|