gusmac wrote:
Now, down to brass tacks. The committee will not be impressed by your record, especially since some of it is fairly recent.
Many would consider drink driving to be in itself dangerous, and a dr70 is as good as a drink driving conviction.
You only got your licence back 2 years ago and I believe a dr endorsement counts for 10 years and gets removed after 11 years. I could be wrong there.
I understand your concerns and thank you for your support and advice.
However i have done a great deal of research into the matter and have also been in touch with a taxi insurance company that insures me that they only search as far back as 5 years, and that my insurance for private hire purposes will be no more than anyother driver beginning a taxi career.
As for my DR20 in 2000 (i made a mistake when i said 2001) that expired on 27th October 2011. My rehabilitation period for a DR70 in 2007, which is failing to provide a road side breath test, was only a 5 year rehabiitation period which was up in March.
Also the driving commissioner who granted my application for an LGV was happy that the reason i had my DR20 reduced to DR70 in court was because there was huge mitigating circumstances concerning the case, which there was.
I actually took the roadside breath test and failed, however the test back at the police station proved inconclusive and i was charged with failing to provide, which i felt was harsh, as i know in myself i tried to give a reading.
However after being charged i was told that there was warrants out for my arrest for notorious crimes and that i was being kept in the cells to be taken to court in the morning where i would be taken into custody. However after a brief spell, i was charged with DR20 and released.
I did not find out till my court case that there was another hardcore criminal up in court with the exact same name as me, and it would turn out when i was originally arrested the officer thought that i was him, and this would explain why the copper would not let me breath in properly.
However there was other mitigating circumstances involved whereby i was forced to plead guilty and not go to trial, and i think the judge that sentenced me must have realised this, as he threw the DR20 out of court and replaced it with a DR70 and only £100 fine. Unfortunately i was also driving without insurance and this was not my first driving ban, so he was forced to give me the maximum driving ban at his disposal.
However, i dont really want to go into all this at the hearing and sound like i am making excuses or trying to seek sympathy, i genuinely regret what happened, i was not innocent, and despite being originally pulled over in mistaken identity, i did just so happen to be driving under the influence.
One of the things about growing up and being responsible is being old enough and wise enough to not get into those situations in the first place. Dont let the devil in the door to begin with, so to speak.
I feel i have learned my lessons, and i would like to prove this to the panel