For once you're correct , I do live in the shadow, however like most radical clerics, you're very selective in your choice of religious interpretations.

IME, muslims use their religion as an excuse as when they want to.

I carried loads of guide dogs in my time as PH, never ever had a problem.

But Mr 187ums agrees that those drivers that refuse guide dogs on the basis of their religion are wrong, and should either adhere to the laws of the land or get another job. He has said that on many occasions.

The interpretation you put up said that that means all muslims should refrain from the trade, but that is but one interpretation. And to accept just one is akin to accepting that all muslims are raving nutters, which we all agree they are not.

the only driver brought to task here about refusing a guide dog was a white Christian

Okay, do a search on google, Yahoo and You Tube, and use Islam and Dogs as your search words and come back and tell me, that my interpretation is the exception and not the rule?

I actually did a little research before coming to my "interpretation" if that's what you want to believe.

You could be right, but when I looked into this a while back I was sent stuff saying that the law of a foreign land (i.e. us) can trump those kind of interpretations.

Same applies with carrying pork and booze.

What maybe is being alluded to is that religion trumps everything, and clearly that's not the case.

This is about the exception and not the general rule then...

yeah he was the first and only exception

Imaging my shock

I'm finding it difficult to understand your point of view, but you do seem to have a deep seated hostility towards the Muslim faith since the soldier was murdered in London.

As for refusing guide dogs, if you do the research, you will see that, in most cases, it is faith-based.