Skull wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
Skull wrote:
but its all inclusive
look at Jman, his insurance is gonna be £3000, his cars £5000+ add in non-fuel items (tyres, road tax, servicing) it soon becomes cloudy as to whats best, plus the car rental means (often) a new vehicle every 3 or 4 years, and a renter can chuck the keys in and walk away in a heartbeat, you cant if youve got HP on a car and penalties to cancel insurance half way through and you get no refund on a plate do you...
£400 a week is £57 a day, take £157 and youve got £600 a week (after fuel) in your sky rocket, even I can see its achievable and im anti-circuit anti-rentals and anti-subcontracting
What don't you get about working 30 hours a week before making a buck for yourself?

Another 8 hours, and it's your average mans working-week with take-home pay. And that's before looking at the safety implications of someone having to work 60-80 hours a week, to earn a decent crust.
Don't you see? Your business model is not only unsafe but verges on the unfeasible.

You are labouring under a misapprehension, your example is a "working man" who wants a living wage and stability with job security, throw that away, work hard and get on, work EXTRA hard and make more is a philosophy not applicable to PAYE workers especially since the working hours directive came in, how many builders/plasterers, etc do 80 hours a week to earn loadsamoney?.....most
PAYE workers on 6.50/hr have it harder, they cant work more than 44 hours, £14872 a year, £4782 of it taxed, I used to work a double shift at the pit (7am-2pm and 10pm-5am) on a friday for the extra....
Dont compare PAYE with self employed businesses