This is the latest input into part 3 of the DDA. I think this is the end of the draft consultation but don't quote me on that because I only glanced through it. The full Text can be found here.
http://www.dptac.gov.uk/consult/12.htm
This is the part relevant to Taxis.
Taxi and other fares
33. The regulations will make it illegal for transport service providers to discriminate against a disabled person in providing a service of a lower standard or on less good terms than those available to other members of the public. DPTAC considers that this extends to fare and pricing policies.
34. DPTAC has learnt that it is common practice for taxi drivers to start the meter as soon as they arrive at the pick-up point, and keep it on until the passenger leaves the vehicle. On occasions, it may take longer for some disabled people to board than for a non-disabled person. We would like to see the Code state that it would not be reasonable for the driver to charge for any additional time taken to board and secure a disabled passenger. The principle that excess fares charged for disabled passengers because of their disability are discriminatory and therefore unlawful should be clearly set out for all transport modes. Other taxi and private hire vehicle issues
35. DPTAC is aware that some taxi drivers have refused to carry powered wheelchairs on the grounds that the wheels of the chair could damage the carpet in the vehicle. We believe that the Code should clarify that this is not reasonable.
36. DPTAC considers that taxi and private hire vehicle drivers should be prepared to give such assistance as is necessary and appropriate to enable passengers to board or alight safely and comfortably. This could include helping a passenger using a wheelchair to board or alight via the ramp and ensuring that they are correctly secured when in the vehicle, deploying a swivel seat, if fitted and required. It could also include describing the vehicle and the direction in which it is facing to a blind or partially-sighted passenger, and being prepared to put the passenger's hand on the vehicle roof, if needed. In addition, when a wheelchair user wishes to transfer from a wheelchair, the driver should be prepared to fold and stow the wheelchair.
37. DPTAC considers that either the Code or the later less formal guidance should also state that it would be good practice for drivers to assist passengers to and from their destination if required and reasonable. The guidance should also recommend that taxi and private hire vehicle drivers should carry public liability insurance, which would enable drivers to provide this kind of assistance without risk to themselves. Some local licensing authorities already require this as a licensing condition.
Booking ahead
38. A substantial proportion of railway stations are either unstaffed or only staffed for part of the time that they are open. Additionally, some trains are driver-only, with no other staff on board.
39. On grounds of equality of treatment and independent living, disabled passengers generally should be able to make a rail journey without having to book in advance and we believe that the Code should specify this. However, there are occasions when journeys involve using stations (as origin, destination or interchange) at times when they are unstaffed. DPTAC considers that either the Code or later, less formal guidance, should state what notice period might be considered reasonable. Failing this, the Disability Rights Commission should support early legal action to clarify the matter through the courts. In our discussions with both disabled people and the rail industry at the Disability Rights Commission's consultation events and on other occasions, the lack of clarity with regard to notice periods has been the single most consistently raised issue.
...................................................................................
Regards
JD