Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 2:23 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Transparent Benchmarks
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 8:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:32 pm
Posts: 400
I received a letter from HMRC about Transparent Benchmarking, Apparently its to do
with income- profit ratio .It appears they want to try it out in this country as it has been successful
in other countries. The maths behind it is, divide your net profit by your turnover and then multiply
by 100 . This result is your net profit ratio .They are looking at figures between 29% to 49% for taxi drivers.

Well my figures for this year and last fall outside these numbers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
youbeenbusy wrote:
I received a letter from HMRC about Transparent Benchmarking, Apparently its to do
with income- profit ratio .It appears they want to try it out in this country as it has been successful
in other countries. The maths behind it is, divide your net profit by your turnover and then multiply
by 100 . This result is your net profit ratio .They are looking at figures between 29% to 49% for taxi drivers.

Well my figures for this year and last fall outside these numbers.

To high or to low?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 10:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:32 pm
Posts: 400
Too high they are in the 50s


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 11:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:36 pm
Posts: 1477
I received the same letter. HMRC have always used "parameters", a type of benchmark. they know that in a given area, the average driver earns, say, £20,000 gross. Any drivers earning say £18,000 to £22,000 won't flag up on their system as an immediate investigation. Anyone outside these figures may well be investigated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
Aye the Tory noose is drawing tight around the necks of the working man. Saying that, it's not like you Cabbies can't afford to pay that little bit extra with all the money you earn. :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin:


Never mind Starbucks, Amazon and the likes, it's the cabbies the Tories want to screw into the ground...sounds like a plan... :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
1 in 100 S/E get looked at

1 in 10 LTD Co will get looked at

All my records got stolen along with my briefcase and laptop



and they use fuel as an indicator of what your takings should be, roughly 4:1 (£4 takings:£1 fuel)

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
wannabeeahack wrote:
1



and they use fuel as an indicator of what your takings should be, roughly 4:1 (£4 takings:£1 fuel)

Where do you get that figure from? based on that figure, I need to use more fuel for the money we take in.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
grandad wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
1



and they use fuel as an indicator of what your takings should be, roughly 4:1 (£4 takings:£1 fuel)

Where do you get that figure from? based on that figure, I need to use more fuel for the money we take in.


my accountant told me, just before i sacked him

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
grandad wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
1



and they use fuel as an indicator of what your takings should be, roughly 4:1 (£4 takings:£1 fuel)

Where do you get that figure from? based on that figure, I need to use more fuel for the money we take in.


Mine is between £5 and £6 per £1 of fuel. Not the world's most fuel efficient cab either. :lol:

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
If the Government allows Volunteer Drivers 45p per mile just to cover running costs only then does that same governments HMRC expect us professional drivers to do it for any less..and we have Higher Insurance, Licences and wages to pay for out of the takings...so out of the 80ppm mile you may charge you'll be luck if you clear 25 or 30 Pence of it for yourself after all costs....and thats taxable.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:09 pm
Posts: 1279
Location: Over here.
Makes I smile when I hear these silly generalised 4.1/5.1/6.1 figures!

So a guy in Norwich who lives on land as flat as flat gets, is going to be to be classified on the same ratio as a land like Wales where they make hills/mountains that eat fuel :lol:

I would always put an argument forward as to why there is no general comparrison to be used - as we all drive differently in any event.

_________________
Common sense........is just not that Common.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
youbeenbusy wrote:
They are looking at figures between 29% to 49% for taxi drivers.

Best they look again then.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Cabby John 1 wrote:
Makes I smile when I hear these silly generalised 4.1/5.1/6.1 figures!

So a guy in Norwich who lives on land as flat as flat gets, is going to be to be classified on the same ratio as a land like Wales where they make hills/mountains that eat fuel :lol:


It is only the up hills that eat fuel. The down hills must save fuel so maybe this cancels it all out.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
grandad wrote:
Cabby John 1 wrote:
Makes I smile when I hear these silly generalised 4.1/5.1/6.1 figures!

So a guy in Norwich who lives on land as flat as flat gets, is going to be to be classified on the same ratio as a land like Wales where they make hills/mountains that eat fuel :lol:


It is only the up hills that eat fuel. The down hills must save fuel so maybe this cancels it all out.


I wish :sad:

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 8:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
According to my usually reliable calculations, a diesel car at 56mpg gives a ratio of about 6.8% of turnover of £20k; a car doing about 30mpg will give a ratio of about 3.8% of £20k turnover.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 230 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group