edders23 wrote:
Quote:
When Mr Smith started at Pimlico Plumbers he was self-employed, before later being taken on as employed staff.
During the six years that he was employed he wasn't given holiday pay which he has worked out amounts to £74,000.
The fella has always been self-employed, but since that mob lost at the courts, akin to Uber and AL, the plumbers have been given workers status. Hence the confused comments above.
The issue the SC decided on wasn't whether or not the fella was due holiday pay, it was for how many years he was eligible for it.
The firm said it should be just one year as all the other years he voluntarily didn't take holiday, he worked through it and got paid for that work.
The SC decided that unless the firm had written to him, saying that unless you take your holiday it will not be rolled over, which they didn't, then he was due all those years holiday pay.