After getting totally out of his depth Scottie the new administrator on fasties has started censoring JT’s posts.

As opposed to looking at his PMs.

Breaking News:

Free speech is definitely not alive and kicking in Edinburgh.

After getting totally out of his depth Scottie the new administrator on fasties has started censoring JT’s posts.

If the truth hurts Scottie, censor it!!


If you want to have a laugh pop over and have a look.


http://www.fastblacks.com/forum/

Has the admin on Fastblacks given a reason for the need to censor Jims posts?

I thought the whole point of adversarial debate was to challenge a point or points of view you disagree with? Taking an axe to a point of view you find unpalatable is not my idea of serious debate aligned to free speach.

TDO caters for all viewpoints and has never axed a post for its opinion and it never will. I find it hard to believe that anyone would axe a post just because they disagreed with it?

Regards

JD

No reason just what you see on the forum.

I think to be quite honest Scottie was just not up to it. As you well know we all have our strengths and weaknesses but you don’t take anyone on in adversarial debate and play to their strengths its just madness. Scottie was simply out gunned and couldn’t handle it nor could he see anyway under the radar hence the dummy spitting routine. Censorship was the act of a desperate man.

That's right Skull, you run and still haven't answered a simple question, but it's not your fault. You complain of censorship but have not been censored. Grow up, you don't really need the dummy you spat out.
Go back to your mates for sympathy and remember to tell them it's all big Scottie's fault. (You know the saying "it wiz a big boy and he ran away...............)

Scottie

Scottie Wrote:

That's right Skull, you run and still haven't answered a simple question, but it's not your fault.

You quoted JD as stating that TDO was out of action due to a software problem.

Your response was: "But we think different."

Thus at the very least you were implying that someone (either JD or whoever informed him of the reasons for the sites downtime) was being dishonest.

This I described as innuendo, and to the extent your implication seemed to be without foundation then it was little more than a gibe.

Thus perhaps you could explain your 'different thinking', and, in particular, given that you don't accept our explanation, why you think the site was down?

And, yes, it was others who mentioned the word 'surreptitious', but this was clearly in response to your own innuendo, so again you're surely being disingenuous and trying to suggest that it was others who were suggesting that TDO was being less than truthful.

As for Supanames, again I can't disagree that there are satisfied customers, but that's hardly inconsistent with what I said above.

Has the admin on Fastblacks given a reason for the need to censor Jims posts?

I thought the whole point of adversarial debate was to challenge a point or points of view you disagree with? Taking an axe to a point of view you find unpalatable is not my idea of serious debate aligned to free speach.

TDO caters for all viewpoints and has never axed a post for its opinion and it never will. I find it hard to believe that anyone would axe a post just because they disagreed with it?

Regards

JD

So if we look at the bigger picture and assume the administration on Fastblacks can't stomach a dissenting opinion how long do you think it will be before you and JT are once again banned?

I suspect an excuse for your expulsion might be that your presence is causing a disruption? lol Or perhaps you retaliated against a person who demonised you? Or you used language incompatible with your status?

Time will tell if the Fastblacks administration is a true guardian of free speech or just a custodian who uses it to silence others.

Regards

JD

I don't think Scottie is holding it together too well and much more of this and he'll pull apart at the seems

Breaking News:

If you want to have a laugh pop over and have a look.