Sussex Man wrote:
Clearly PHM has got carried away with the head-line, but I do think they have a point.
PHs have signage for customer safety, now many may not agree, but it's a fact.
If PHs do ply for hire, then it's enforcement that's required. Fine a few, catch a few, and word will spread. Only lazy and inefficient councils use the excuse, that proper PH signage is wrong.
I mean how will a customer know if the vehicle is the one they ordered, or a rapists car, if all they have is a poxy little sign in the window, and exactly how hard will that be to copy?
A phone number on the side, is not plying for hire. If that was the case, then all you HC boys and girls, should have magnetic door signs, which you should take off, when not in your own area.
Signage for customer safety is bullshit we all know it.
Proving a PH is plying for hire is very difficult to prove and the chances of being caught are remote, the rewards far outway the risks.
The customer knows the right car because the driver will know thier name, it is far better the customer makes this simple check before entering the vehicle, that is far better than getting in because the vehicle has a sticker or door sign.
Any markings on a PH make it more visable and punters will approach it if they think they can get a ride home.
HC should remove their door signs when out of area: thats fine with me and lets have the taximeters out of PH cars and PH adverts out of the taxi section of yellow pages etc. and when a PH driver commits an offence lets have him called a PH driver and not a taxi-driver as is always the case now. There are doulble standards everywhere in this trade.
The solution is to abolish the 2 tier system. But this needs to be done in a controlled way, suddenly flooding the market is no good to anyone.