Anonymous wrote:
The benefit to them is that if they maintain a reasonable business equilibrium in the trade, then that trade can afford to buy the shiny new taxis they like so much. Too many taxis, poor business level, and all you get are bangers in the fleet.
We don't have that here in Edinburgh.
You can sing the praises of the free market, suggesting that if plate numbers were not controlled, then somehow the whole service would be better. Take a look at Dublin to see what your vision of the future would be.
As for the college course, I believe that we should be encouraging skill development. But it should be on a voluntary basis, with incentives to learn and improve.
I don't think there's any proven link between license quotas and raised quality Jim, the bottom line is that if any measure of standard is thought desirable then it has to be regulated for by the appropriate authority.
As I said further up, the market is fundamentally uncompetitive, so there's no incentive to raise standards, particularly in big cities where there's enough street work to be able to depend on it.
Compare New York and London, for example, the former infamous for a poor quality taxi service, while the latter is claimed to be home to the best taxi service in the world.
Yet plates in NY are worth over $200,000, while plates in London are worth nothing. The difference in quality is simply because it's specified differently in the two cities.
All the restrictions in NY do is suck money out of the trade, perhaps the best part of a billion dollars a year, towards the many outsiders who use taxi plates as an investment.
Thus the driver pays maybe $100 (?) of his daily take just to lease the plate, and the wages for drivers is still awful, and it's not hard to see why.
The whole quality issue is a red herring, as you yourself say there are bangers in Edinburgh, and there were presumably scruffy drivers which led to the need for a dress code.
Thus I don't agree with your view of the college course as being voluntary, as we all probably know those who could benefit from these things won't do it voluntarily, and those who would would probably see little point.
Although I take your word about your particular course being crap, I agree with these kinds of things per se.
The bottom line is that most of the quality evident in the Edinburgh trade, as elswehere, is specified by the council - if it wasn't, you would be providing the kind of service which you claim the PH trade in Edinburgh is providing, with or without license quotas.
As Andy said, the Dublin experience does not really support your case, but it does provide a good argument for qualitative standards, rather than quantitative restrictions.
Dublin is like letting your PH take over the HC sector.
Dusty