Taxi Driver Online
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/

Makes even that GMB chap seem moderate
http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=9739		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Fae Fife [ Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:20 am ]
Post subject:  Makes even that GMB chap seem moderate
Nothing to do with taxis, but worth a read :D

Labour councillor who branded the Queen a 'sectarian racist' faces censure

Published Date: 19 October 2008
By Marc Horne

A COUNCILLOR who said the Queen is a "sectarian racist" is facing disciplinary action from his party.

Labour councillor Terry Kelly, a former election agent for Wendy Alexander, launched a tirade against the Queen and the monarchy. The Renfrewshire Council member used his blog to unleash a barrage of vituperative comments which his own party has condemned as unacceptable.

In Kelly's online rant he also:

- Claimed that Britain would be better off if the Royal Family met the same fate as Tsar Nicholas II of Russia;

- Described the Royals as a "parasitical bunch of braying half wits";

- Claimed that Princess Anne looked like a "bulldog chewing a wasp";

- Lampooned Prince Harry and Prince William as "the Chuckle Brothers".

The veteran left-winger penned an article titled 'The Queen was in her Counting House Counting out her Money', which states: "I know it sounds churlish, with them being such nice folk and role models, but how many hospitals, schools, etc could we build if we did what the Bolsheviks did all those years ago?"

He then ridicules each member of the Royal Family in turn: "There's Madge (the Queen], the glove puppet, Big Phil (the Duke of Edinburgh], expert at shaking hands and insulting minorities, Charles, Andrew and Edward, the brains trust, and Anne, who looks and acts like a bulldog chewing a wasp.

"They are followed of course by the Chuckle Brothers 'Winco Willie and Hooray Henry', both of whom need to use both hands to find their own arses."

In response to criticism from a visitor to the site Kelly makes the bizarre statement: "If Prince Charles were to dump Camilla and marry a Muslim he would not succeed. In these circumstances the Queen should abdicate, not to do so would be to support racism.

"In fact she is supporting racism just now by not demanding change so, I'm afraid that your beloved monarch is a sectarian racist."

A Labour insider said it was very likely that Kelly would face the prospect of disciplinary action. He said: "Given the circumstances we will be looking to see what action can be taken."

Kelly insisted that his remarks were not meant to be taken seriously, stating: "I was joking. I am opposed to capital punishment violence. But I do want rid of the monarchy. It is an anachronism and an embarrassment."

A spokeswoman for Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

Scotland on Sunday
Author:  GBC [ Sun Oct 19, 2008 3:55 pm ]
Post subject: 
Does Terry scribe under a pseudonym?

Good example though of why the left are a dying breed. :wink:
Author:  wannabeeahack [ Sun Oct 19, 2008 4:50 pm ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
- Claimed that Britain would be better off if the Royal Family met the same fate as Tsar Nicholas II of Russia;

- Described the Royals as a "parasitical bunch of braying half wits";

- Claimed that Princess Anne looked like a "bulldog chewing a wasp";

- Lampooned Prince Harry and Prince William as "the Chuckle Brothers".

The veteran left-winger penned an article titled 'The Queen was in her Counting House Counting out her Money', which states: "I know it sounds churlish, with them being such nice folk and role models, but how many hospitals, schools, etc could we build if we did what the Bolsheviks did all those years ago?"


erm, cant ACTUALLY argue with the guy really can you...

The monarchy/royal family have more hangers on than a crowded punjabi railway carriage, what theyev got theyve either been given or stole from the population/taxpayer and while phillip is greek (couldnt speak english when he came here) his missus is half (at least) german, indeed "our" royal family (the WINDSORS) were not always so called...because they didnt fancy such a germanic name as saxe-coburg-gotha when we were at war with their cousins/uncles country....



The House of Windsor came into being in 1917, when the name was adopted as the British Royal Family's official name by a proclamation of King George V, replacing the historic name of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. It remains the family name of the current Royal Family.
Author:  captain cab [ Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:47 pm ]
Post subject: 
wannabeeahack wrote:
erm, cant ACTUALLY argue with the guy really can you...


I'd have a go.

The blokes obviously a f*ckwit of the first order, in order to create an image for himself he's having a go at the Royal Family who wont respond.

Aint that a little lkie kicking a blind bloke in the b*llocks?

He obviously realises he and his corrupt political party are in the sh*t so he's trying to make peace with the morons out there before a future election, the royal family are nothing but a convenient target.

If he wants targets he should perhaps look at his own council in 2006 they spent £1,244,000 on publicity ffs

http://tpa.typepad.com/home/files/the_great_british_taxpayer_ripoff.pdf

CC
Author:  csp [ Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:17 pm ]
Post subject: 
captain cab wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
erm, cant ACTUALLY argue with the guy really can you...


I'd have a go.

The blokes obviously a f*ckwit of the first order, in order to create an image for himself he's having a go at the Royal Family who wont respond.

Aint that a little lkie kicking a blind bloke in the b*llocks?

He obviously realises he and his corrupt political party are in the sh*t so he's trying to make peace with the morons out there before a future election, the royal family are nothing but a convenient target.



If he wants targets he should perhaps look at his own council in 2006 they spent £1,244,000 on publicity ffs

http://tpa.typepad.com/home/files/the_great_british_taxpayer_ripoff.pdf

CC
Here Here Captain =D>
Author:  wannabeeahack [ Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:22 pm ]
Post subject: 
[edited by admin] the royal spongers i say
Author:  GBC [ Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:35 pm ]
Post subject: 
captain cab wrote:
I'd have a go.

The blokes obviously a f*ckwit of the first order, in order to create an image for himself he's having a go at the Royal Family who wont respond.

Aint that a little lkie kicking a blind bloke in the b*llocks?

He obviously realises he and his corrupt political party are in the sh*t so he's trying to make peace with the morons out there before a future election, the royal family are nothing but a convenient target.

If he wants targets he should perhaps look at his own council in 2006 they spent £1,244,000 on publicity ffs






=D>
Author:  wannabeeahack [ Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:33 am ]
Post subject: 
£40 milllion well spent............

not

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7477222.stm
Author:  acabbie [ Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:30 am ]
Post subject: 
Less than 70p a year per person........A price worth paying in my opinion if it means we don't have a president.
Author:  wannabeeahack [ Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:07 pm ]
Post subject: 
ok, so how do you justify this then...



TSEM7830 - Deceased persons: intestacy - England and Wales - division of estate

Subject to the rights of the surviving spouse or civil partner ( TSEM7826), the estate is divisible in equal shares among the children of the intestate. The share of a deceased child passes to his/her issue, if any. If the intestate leaves no issue, the estate passes to his/her parents if living at the date of his/her death. Failing parents, the estate passes to his/her brothers and sisters. Failing these it goes to his/her more remote relatives. Where a beneficiary is unmarried and under 18 (21 if the intestate died before 1 January 1970), the income of his/her share may be paid or applied for his/her maintenance, education or benefit. Any surplus income is accumulated in trust until he/she reaches the age of 18 (or 21, as appropriate) or marries or enters into a civil partnership under that age.
No surviving kin

Where there are no surviving kin entitled to his/her estate, the estate passes as bona vacantia to

* the Crown, or
* the Duchy of Lancaster (if the deceased was resident in the Duchy of Lancaster) or
* the Duchy of Cornwall (if the deceased was resident in the Duchy of Cornwall).


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

tell me THAT isnt plain robbery under the old serfdom rules?, what next, prince harry can deflower any virgin on her wedding night? (seignoural rights)

this 2008, time they were all gone.
Author:  wannabeeahack [ Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:11 pm ]
Post subject: 
acabbie wrote:
Less than 70p a year per person........A price worth paying in my opinion if it means we don't have a president.


your opinion, so you can pay my share cos frankly i loathe all of em, cant find 1 id trust
Author:  captain cab [ Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:29 pm ]
Post subject: 
the difference is wannabe is that your not trying to make political capital out if it.

CC
Author:  acabbie [ Tue Oct 21, 2008 1:40 pm ]
Post subject: 
wannabeeahack wrote:
acabbie wrote:
Less than 70p a year per person........A price worth paying in my opinion if it means we don't have a president.


your opinion, so you can pay my share cos frankly i loathe all of em, cant find 1 id trust


yes, my opinion, last i heard i was indeed entitled to one.........you may not agree with my sentiments but at least give me the good grace and politeness to express them.
Author:  GBC [ Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:07 pm ]
Post subject: 
God save the Queen. Image
Author:  wannabeeahack [ Tue Oct 21, 2008 2:49 pm ]
Post subject: 
acabbie wrote:
wannabeeahack wrote:
acabbie wrote:
Less than 70p a year per person........A price worth paying in my opinion if it means we don't have a president.


your opinion, so you can pay my share cos frankly i loathe all of em, cant find 1 id trust


yes, my opinion, last i heard i was indeed entitled to one.........you may not agree with my sentiments but at least give me the good grace and politeness to express them.


"whilst a accept your right to an opinion, i reserve my right not to accept it"

maybe if i was in a london cab, a black iconic london cab, with tourists gagging to see buck house id think different, but im not, i dont have and therefore retain my views

The Royal family are leeches we could do without

I REALLY hope the windsors have lots tied up in IceBank
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/