Yorkie wrote:
look the site has accused nige of lying,
Nigel was given enough rope to hang himself and so was his partner in crime. If it had been any forum other than this they would have had their marching orders long ago. The administration of this site can't allow posters to threaten and abuse them with impunity. They also can't allow defamatory and libellous statements to be thrown around like confetti. The administration do not have to account to anyone on here, if you don't like the way this forum is run then you have the option to take your wisdom somewhere else.
So far in this thread you have spouted nothing but nonsense. You harp on about a document, which has nothing whatsoever to do with you but you claim it has, yet you cant say how or why? When you start using your own telephone line and commit yourself to countless hours of information gathering then you might be able to claim you had some input into this document but until then? All you are entitled to do is read it, and that's all you are entitled to do.
This document was produced to show the true facts of what is happening in respect of the Government guidance. It has been of assistance to all concerned because they can see which councils are doing what. It doesn't matter if you are for, or against lifting numbers, that database gives everyone the same information.
Some vested interests may not like the factual comments in the document but that is just tough luck. They also might not like the way restricted councils are changing their policy at a rapid rate of knots, hence the statements from the NTA and the nonsense spouted in the monthly magazine for professional cab drivers they call Taxitalk.
So love it or loath it, its here to stay and it’s the only one of its kind so you better get used it but don't ever say you had any input into it, because you didn't
PS. look out for the next edition it might just have the names Nigel, Angel and Yorkshireman in the properties. lol
JD
Login
Register
FAQ
