jimbo wrote:
20??
Might have been a better bet?
Might have been a better bet?
I might have agreed a few weeks ago, but now I sure it will be 201?.
| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| 20?? http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=17226 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | jimbo [ Sun Jul 24, 2011 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | 20?? |
20?? Might have been a better bet? |
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sun Jul 24, 2011 7:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
jimbo wrote: 20??
Might have been a better bet? I might have agreed a few weeks ago, but now I sure it will be 201?.
|
|
| Author: | charles007 [ Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
Sussex wrote: jimbo wrote: 20?? Might have been a better bet? I might have agreed a few weeks ago, but now I sure it will be 201?. and he calls me "but now I sure it will be"
|
|
| Author: | MR T [ Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
charles007 wrote: Sussex wrote: jimbo wrote: 20?? Might have been a better bet? I might have agreed a few weeks ago, but now I sure it will be 201?. and he calls me "but now I sure it will be"
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Wed Aug 24, 2011 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
charles007 wrote: Sussex wrote: jimbo wrote: 20?? Might have been a better bet? I might have agreed a few weeks ago, but now I sure it will be 201?. and he calls me "but now I sure it will be"
|
|
| Author: | charles007 [ Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
Sussex wrote: charles007 wrote: Sussex wrote: jimbo wrote: 20?? Might have been a better bet? I might have agreed a few weeks ago, but now I sure it will be 201?. and he calls me "but now I sure it will be" those in class houes. |
|
| Author: | Chris the Fish [ Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
charles007 wrote: those in class houes.
Shouldn't throw bones? |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
Chris the Fish wrote: charles007 wrote: those in class houes. Shouldn't throw bones? FFS!!! The pair 'o you!! |
|
| Author: | Eiji [ Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
2016/2017 me thinks. |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
I think this will be 2013. Just enough time for some of you to retire and leave others to clear up the mess. CC |
|
| Author: | toots [ Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
captain cab wrote: I think this will be 2013. Just enough time for some of you to retire and leave others to clear up the mess. CC I think it maybe 2013 for the initial paper so those that wish to retire after reading it can do so after christmas perhaps around February 2014 |
|
| Author: | Eiji [ Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
As far as I've read, the draft bill will be ready by November 2013. Is it going to go through the House of Common's and Lords that fast as to pass by 2014?  I suppose it'd be that fast if we've been had and the consultation is being done just to satisfy the law. |
|
| Author: | toots [ Sun Nov 20, 2011 12:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
Eiji wrote: As far as I've read, the draft bill will be ready by November 2013. Is it going to go through the House of Common's and Lords that fast as to pass by 2014? I suppose it'd be that fast if we've been had and the consultation is being done just to satisfy the law. Cynic, but in my opinion probably correct. The law commission said they wanted it ready so if the government wished to impose it they could before the next election |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Sun Nov 20, 2011 1:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 20?? |
Eiji wrote: I suppose it'd be that fast if we've been had and the consultation is being done just to satisfy the law. I think you hit the nail. CC |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|