Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 8:02 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:20 am 
toots wrote:
Doom wrote:
Limited hackney carriage numbers

Over 25% of local authorities limit the number of hackney carriages that they will licence, based on the "no significant unmet demand" test (s15 Transport Act 1985 applied to s37 Town Police Clauses Act 1847). This leads to a market in licences (with licences commanding premiums of over £50,000 in some cases), and prevents entry to the market for those without significant capital. The process of limitation also involves enormous amounts of local authority time (both members and officers) and increases costs to the hackney carriage trade, without any demonstrable benefit to the travelling public..


So the legal profession is one of an open door then, anyone can become a solicitor if they want to, maybe we should start asking the monopoly commission to look into how they justify prices like there's then, after all, if we're going to get examined and tampered with, why not the legal eagles, £50 for a letter etc, £10k to say a man can have 20% and his ex wife 80%, yes lets make our mission one to bring legal costs down to a sensible level.


The legal profession was examined and opened up years ago that's why you have all those claim companies suddenly come out of the woodwork :wink: Incidentally anybody can become a solicitor, if you're prepared to go to college/uni and then 5 years of articles or you could become the 'private hire' of the legal trade and work your way up to legal executive



Didn't really mean that side of it, I mean the outrageous charges they hit everyone with.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37029
Location: Wayneistan
Doom wrote:
toots wrote:
Doom wrote:
Limited hackney carriage numbers

Over 25% of local authorities limit the number of hackney carriages that they will licence, based on the "no significant unmet demand" test (s15 Transport Act 1985 applied to s37 Town Police Clauses Act 1847). This leads to a market in licences (with licences commanding premiums of over £50,000 in some cases), and prevents entry to the market for those without significant capital. The process of limitation also involves enormous amounts of local authority time (both members and officers) and increases costs to the hackney carriage trade, without any demonstrable benefit to the travelling public..


So the legal profession is one of an open door then, anyone can become a solicitor if they want to, maybe we should start asking the monopoly commission to look into how they justify prices like there's then, after all, if we're going to get examined and tampered with, why not the legal eagles, £50 for a letter etc, £10k to say a man can have 20% and his ex wife 80%, yes lets make our mission one to bring legal costs down to a sensible level.


The legal profession was examined and opened up years ago that's why you have all those claim companies suddenly come out of the woodwork :wink: Incidentally anybody can become a solicitor, if you're prepared to go to college/uni and then 5 years of articles or you could become the 'private hire' of the legal trade and work your way up to legal executive



Didn't really mean that side of it, I mean the outrageous charges they hit everyone with.



a bit like cherrypicking :badgrin:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:23 am 
[/quote]


a bit like cherrypicking :badgrin:[/quote]



:-$ :lol:


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14150
Location: Wirral
Well when you've spent several years at univeristy earning not a lot at all and then 5 years doing articles earning not a lot I guess they think they've earned all that lovely money. They do save people a lot of money sometimes and even allow people to keep their freedom and god only knows how much that is worth. If you think it's so simple to do go take yourself off to uni but be warned it's not like the piece of p*ss they call NVQ

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37029
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:
Well when you've spent several years at univeristy earning not a lot at all and then 5 years doing articles earning not a lot I guess they think they've earned all that lovely money. They do save people a lot of money sometimes and even allow people to keep their freedom and god only knows how much that is worth. If you think it's so simple to do go take yourself off to uni but be warned it's not like the piece of p*ss they call NVQ



If that is true, how come they choose to have perms?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14150
Location: Wirral
captain cab wrote:
toots wrote:
Well when you've spent several years at univeristy earning not a lot at all and then 5 years doing articles earning not a lot I guess they think they've earned all that lovely money. They do save people a lot of money sometimes and even allow people to keep their freedom and god only knows how much that is worth. If you think it's so simple to do go take yourself off to uni but be warned it's not like the piece of p*ss they call NVQ



If that is true, how come they choose to have perms?

CC


It might be a natural mop and not a perm :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37029
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:
captain cab wrote:
toots wrote:
Well when you've spent several years at univeristy earning not a lot at all and then 5 years doing articles earning not a lot I guess they think they've earned all that lovely money. They do save people a lot of money sometimes and even allow people to keep their freedom and god only knows how much that is worth. If you think it's so simple to do go take yourself off to uni but be warned it's not like the piece of p*ss they call NVQ



If that is true, how come they choose to have perms?

CC


It might be a natural mop and not a perm :wink:


:lol: =D>

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 4:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:11 pm
Posts: 498
Location: Ayr
No decent Solicitor does "No win ~ No Fee" Work.

They leave that to the half-wits and the Barrow Boys and get on with the Commercial Stuff that makes real money

_________________
Don't dream it ~ Be it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
from the amount of people against him...... that is now documented.... only a fool that wished to commit political suicide would take him seriously

Other than the LTDA, TDO has more members than any other so-called representative group at that meeting.

So the fact that they all seemed to be anti one-tier doesn't indicate it wont happen just because of that.

I don't think a one-tier system could happen, unless they exclude London from the new act.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54058
Location: 1066 Country
Doom wrote:
Relative of yours?

He is Dusty and my triplet brother.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14150
Location: Wirral
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
from the amount of people against him...... that is now documented.... only a fool that wished to commit political suicide would take him seriously

Other than the LTDA, TDO has more members than any other so-called representative group at that meeting.

So the fact that they all seemed to be anti one-tier doesn't indicate it wont happen just because of that.

I don't think a one-tier system could happen, unless they exclude London from the new act.


Why exclude London :?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37029
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:

Why exclude London :?



Coz London is special #-o

More seriously....hows about this for some much needed common sense.

All the London Cab acts do not encompass PH.

The London PH Act does not encompass taxis.

Why dont we get the taxi bits thrown out of the 1976 act......or better still adopt the London PH act nationally?

Why dont we cherrypick the good bits of law from all acts and come up with two distinct codes?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
captain cab wrote:
Why dont we cherrypick the good bits of law from all acts and come up with two distinct codes?


Why not cherrypick best practice from thoughout the UK and see what comes up rather than pandering to the vested interests who simply want a modified version of the status quo because its suits their vested interests?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14150
Location: Wirral
Dusty Bin wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Why dont we cherrypick the good bits of law from all acts and come up with two distinct codes?


Why not cherrypick best practice from thoughout the UK and see what comes up rather than pandering to the vested interests who simply want a modified version of the status quo because its suits their vested interests?


Cos if you do that they come up with restriction and regular surveys

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 3:35 pm 
toots wrote:
Dusty Bin wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Why dont we cherrypick the good bits of law from all acts and come up with two distinct codes?


Why not cherrypick best practice from thoughout the UK and see what comes up rather than pandering to the vested interests who simply want a modified version of the status quo because its suits their vested interests?


Cos if you do that they come up with restriction and regular surveys


aka the sensible choice.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group