Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue May 14, 2024 6:22 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54165
Location: 1066 Country
In Mr Roland's PHM opinion, he states;

All I know is that some 94 councils in England and Wales still retain the numbers limits; that is 20 more than ten years ago, so there is clear and unequivocal evidence that councils have been re-regulating - because of the effects imposed upon them by their deregulating status.

Oh dear. [-X

Not everyone agreed with the viewpoint taken by the OFT, including the then government, but no-one questioned their numbers in respect of the number of councils that restrict, and the number of councils that allow free entry to the taxi trade.

In their report, 9 years ago, they stated that 45% of the 343 licensing authorities restricted taxi numbers, down for 74% in 1986. So that roughly mean 154 councils then restricted.

The following year (2004) the DfT wrote to the 151 councils that still restricted taxi numbers asking them to justify their policies. At that time TDO's good friend JD started his restrictions list, which has been kept going since he sadly left us.

JD's restrictions list

This list is an accurate up to date list, and shows that only 86 councils still restrict taxi numbers, and that includes those few councils that have re-restricted, and the one council that has re-delimited (my word of the day).

Quite where Mr Roland got his stats from is unclear, but what is crystal clear is they are so far from the truth that one wonders why he put them in his magazine.

He should know better. [-X

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54165
Location: 1066 Country
In his opinion piece he also tries to lobby operators to write to the LC (good thing) indicating how bad it will be if their PH drivers leave that side of the trade and work on the other side (bad thing).

I think it's called 'freedom of choice' Mr Roland. :-k

Still it's interesting to see that gene pool of the 'Northern Mill Owners' is still alive and thriving up north in the PH trade.

And there was silly old me thinking that slavery was abolished. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37029
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
In his opinion piece he also tries to lobby operators to write to the LC (good thing) indicating how bad it will be if their PH drivers leave that side of the trade and work on the other side (bad thing).

I think it's called 'freedom of choice' Mr Roland. :-k

Still it's interesting to see that gene pool of the 'Northern Mill Owners' is still alive and thriving up north in the PH trade.

And there was silly old me thinking that slavery was abolished. :sad:



Yes, and here's little old me going to suggest scrapping operators licenses and making the PH drivers license a dual ph driver operator license.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54165
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Yes, and here's little old me going to suggest scrapping operators licenses and making the PH drivers license a dual ph driver operator license.

I often wondered why they don't make the badge the ops license.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37029
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
I often wondered why they don't make the badge the ops license.



Because it'll upset PH Barons?

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
In Mr Roland's PHM opinion, he states;

All I know is that some 94 councils in England and Wales still retain the numbers limits; that is 20 more than ten years ago, so there is clear and unequivocal evidence that councils have been re-regulating - because of the effects imposed upon them by their deregulating status.

Oh dear. [-X

Not everyone agreed with the viewpoint taken by the OFT, including the then government, but no-one questioned their numbers in respect of the number of councils that restrict, and the number of councils that allow free entry to the taxi trade.

In their report, 9 years ago, they stated that 45% of the 343 licensing authorities restricted taxi numbers, down for 74% in 1986. So that roughly mean 154 councils then restricted.

The following year (2004) the DfT wrote to the 151 councils that still restricted taxi numbers asking them to justify their policies. At that time TDO's good friend JD started his restrictions list, which has been kept going since he sadly left us.

JD's restrictions list

This list is an accurate up to date list, and shows that only 86 councils still restrict taxi numbers, and that includes those few councils that have re-restricted, and the one council that has re-delimited (my word of the day).

Quite where Mr Roland got his stats from is unclear, but what is crystal clear is they are so far from the truth that one wonders why he put them in his magazine.

He should know better. [-X

He only has 15 years of evidence in his archives.

Where's your evidence from the last 15 years?

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8519
JD used to get loads of things wrong ,, I never told him, it wasn't in my interests

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54165
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
He only has 15 years of evidence in his archives.

Where's your evidence from the last 15 years?

You are joking aren't you? :?

According to Mr Roland 10 years ago only 74 councils restricted. When in reality 154 did.

JD's list is an accurate list, unless you can point to where it's wrong.

It lists all those council that restricted in 2004 and what they have done since, either de-limited, stayed restricted, re-restricted or re-delimited.

If you and Mr Roland are going to try and get the LC to change their view by repeating utter lies, then you deserve what you will get.

But I will give you a question for starters. Mr Roland says that 20 councils have re-restricted in the last 10 years, I say that is rubbish, however I look forward to seeing those councils that have done so, so who are they?

TBH I can't believe I'm actually having this conversation with someone like you. ](*,)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54165
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
JD used to get loads of things wrong ,, I never told him, it wasn't in my interests

So you believe that only 74 councils restricted in 2004. Your lot are defo doomed. ](*,)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
He only has 15 years of evidence in his archives.

Where's your evidence from the last 15 years?

You are joking aren't you? :?

According to Mr Roland 10 years ago only 74 councils restricted. When in reality 154 did.

JD's list is an accurate list, unless you can point to where it's wrong.

It lists all those council that restricted in 2004 and what they have done since, either de-limited, stayed restricted, re-restricted or re-delimited.

If you and Mr Roland are going to try and get the LC to change their view by repeating utter lies, then you deserve what you will get.

But I will give you a question for starters. Mr Roland says that 20 councils have re-restricted in the last 10 years, I say that is rubbish, however I look forward to seeing those councils that have done so, so who are they?

TBH I can't believe I'm actually having this conversation with someone like you. ](*,)

TDO has been going how long?

PHTM has been going how Long?

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
And me making a statement like say, 'Pink pigs were flying over Brighton on 25th May 1987' is just a statement, just like you make similar staements, whatever they may be.

You saying my statement is wrong and me saying your statement is wrong proves absolutely nothing.

I believe I am right and you believe you are right.

You have an agenda, which we all know and I have an agenda too.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37029
Location: Wayneistan
I always found JD's list to be accurate.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54165
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
TDO has been going how long?

PHTM has been going how Long?

WTF has that got to do with it?

The numbers I quote are from the OFT report, no-one other than you and Mr Roland (and now the T man) have ever questioned those stats, because they were based on returns to the DfT from the councils themselves.

Yet you are now happy to say in 2002 only 74 councils restricted, yet in 2003 154 did, then in 2004 151 did.

If you follow your train of thought 80 councils restricted in the 12 months between 2003 and 2004, only for 60 of them to re-delimit by today. If Mr Roland's 94 is correct.

For the record there are 86 councils in England and Wales that restrict, including about half a dozen that have re-restricted. And Bracknell that have re-delimited.

Mr Roland's numbers are so far out I'm amazed that anyone gives his quote any credence, especially someone like you that has a brain.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54165
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
I believe I am right and you believe you are right.

I know I'm right.

If you were right then the DfT and OFT and anyone else who has followed this for many many years is wrong.

However I'm open minded, so please tell me those 74 councils (no-more, no-less) that restricted numbers in 2002, and the 20 councils that have re-restricted since.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 54165
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
I always found JD's list to be accurate.

Captain please PM him and put him right. FFS. ](*,)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group