| Taxi Driver Online http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/ |
|
| With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level . . http://www.taxi-driver.co.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=19833 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level . . |
. . . of apathy within the taxi and private hire trades and also amongst licensing councillors and officers in your LA? |
|
| Author: | toots [ Sun Jul 22, 2012 4:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
Is it apathy or ignorance or both? |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
toots wrote: Is it apathy or ignorance or both? Probably both and with only you making a comment after 37 have viewed this thread, 'Apathy Rules KO!' as the dyslexic wrote. |
|
| Author: | Chris the Fish [ Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
I can't be bothered to be apathetic. Our LA is paying attention - our members look to the PLTA committee - the rest, yes, apathetic and ignorant. |
|
| Author: | gusmac [ Sun Jul 22, 2012 6:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: . . . of apathy within the taxi and private hire trades and also amongst licensing councillors and officers in your LA? The PH trade in my area are on the ball. The council are also on the ball. The taxi trade in my area can't f***ing spell ball. |
|
| Author: | Chris the Fish [ Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
Sussex wrote: The PH trade is my area are on the ball. The council are also on the ball. The taxi trade in my area can't f***ing spell ball. But their grammar is correct?
|
|
| Author: | Sussex [ Sun Jul 22, 2012 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
Chris the Fish wrote: But their grammar is correct? ![]()
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
toots wrote: Is it apathy or ignorance or both? The document costs £40, the document is too long, the document summary is broadly inaccurate so you need to read the thick document, to read the thick document you need to be aware of taxi law, to read the thick document you need to trust the LC as being honest in their citations....they arent.....and you need time to do all of the above. You also need to be able to believe you will make a difference, many dont believe this and with good reason too. Beware the ides of march |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
captain cab wrote: toots wrote: Is it apathy or ignorance or both? The document costs £40, the document is too long, the document summary is broadly inaccurate so you need to read the thick document, to read the thick document you need to be aware of taxi law, to read the thick document you need to trust the LC as being honest in their citations....they arent.....and you need time to do all of the above. You also need to be able to believe you will make a difference, many dont believe this and with good reason too. Beware the ides of march You missed out that the original document was over 500 pages long and as only 240 or so pages were published for the trades' attention, it follows that the other 260 plus pages or so were selectively culled, leaving the trades' to mull over the 'healthy pages'. |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: You missed out that the original document was over 500 pages long and as only 240 or so pages were published for the trades' attention, it follows that the other 260 plus pages or so were selectively culled, leaving the trades' to mull over the 'healthy pages'. I missed that out, they missed a plot, which presumably they lost when they hired James Button as an advisor........tbh in terms of tact thats like hiring osama bin laden for the new british airways commercial. |
|
| Author: | Brummie Cabbie [ Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
captain cab wrote: Brummie Cabbie wrote: You missed out that the original document was over 500 pages long and as only 240 or so pages were published for the trades' attention, it follows that the other 260 plus pages or so were selectively culled, leaving the trades' to mull over the 'healthy pages'. I missed that out, they missed a plot, which presumably they lost when they hired James Button as an advisor........tbh in terms of tact thats like hiring osama bin laden for the new british airways commercial. But bin is dead; are you suggesting Jimmy has felt this world for a another place too? |
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: But bin is dead; are you suggesting Jimmy has felt this world for a another place too? wouldnt dream of it, till i plunge a stake through his heart first
|
|
| Author: | captain cab [ Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
Of course, it could be that the document is more confusing than 'twin peaks'
|
|
| Author: | toots [ Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: With regard to Consultation Paper 203, what is the level |
Brummie Cabbie wrote: You missed out that the original document was over 500 pages long and as only 240 or so pages were published for the trades' attention, it follows that the other 260 plus pages or so were selectively culled, leaving the trades' to mull over the 'healthy pages'. Is that cryptic for the pages they want you to see? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|