Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu May 07, 2026 5:58 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Scarborough taxi drivers caught on camera

8:49am Thursday 9th June 2011

Taxi drivers in a North Yorkshire town could soon be filmed on their journeys thanks to CCTV in their cars.

Scarborough Borough Council’s licensing committee is set to review a new policy requested by drivers in an attempt to protect them from attacks from passengers.

It sets out strict conditions for the use of CCTV in Hackney carriage vehicles and private hire transport and states all cameras must store footage which only the council and the police will be able to see.

The cameras will cost drivers about £550 to install and the council’s licensing committee has been recommended to approve the policy.

Source; http://www.gazetteherald.co.uk/news/907 ... on_camera/

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Scarborough taxi drivers caught on camera

8:49am Thursday 9th June 2011

Taxi drivers in a North Yorkshire town could soon be filmed on their journeys thanks to CCTV in their cars.

Scarborough Borough Council’s licensing committee is set to review a new policy requested by drivers in an attempt to protect them from attacks from passengers.

It sets out strict conditions for the use of CCTV in Hackney carriage vehicles and private hire transport and states all cameras must store footage which only the council and the police will be able to see.

The cameras will cost drivers about £550 to install and the council’s licensing committee has been recommended to approve the policy.

Source; http://www.gazetteherald.co.uk/news/907 ... on_camera/


there is no safe system of cctv, only police/council access to cctv footage, there is software on the internet to crack any system


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:06 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
Stinky Pete wrote:
there is no safe system of cctv, only police/council access to cctv footage, there is software on the internet to crack any system

If it stops drivers being killed, then I would say they are all safe.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:51 am
Posts: 104
A £5 dummy camera then would do the deterrent job just as well.

A £350 camera would also do the job just as well.

The chosen for us cameras have facility to spy on the drivers lifestyle, this is against basic human rights.

Why then are the trade forced to buy from chosen suppliers at extorted prices just to satisfy council snooping?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Nemisis wrote:
A £5 dummy camera then would do the deterrent job just as well.

A £350 camera would also do the job just as well.

The chosen for us cameras have facility to spy on the drivers lifestyle, this is against basic human rights.

Why then are the trade forced to buy from chosen suppliers at extorted prices just to satisfy council snooping?


The council don't have automatic access to the content of the system. the only time that the system would be viewed would be following an incident. This would be instigated by either the driver or a passenger who has a complaint.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:49 pm
Posts: 1331
Location: Midlands
The ones we used to have could only be accessed by the CCTV control room employees in a controlled environment.

_________________
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Image
Believe me, don't get Mercury X2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:51 am
Posts: 104
If there is to be no access to images by the driver (who coincidently has paid through the nose for the thing) then on a driver complaining, if police or council cannot be asked they will have the same response as with the street cameras, not working, wrong angles wrong light...etc etc.

Be sure all will be working 100% if its the driver in the frame.

As Skull said, we have no rights, we are manipulated and abused on the whims of our regulators. This is just another nail in the coffin under the guise of driver protection.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 3:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:51 am
Posts: 104
Midlander wrote:
The ones we used to have could only be accessed by the CCTV control room employees in a controlled environment.


The same control room that never sees the thug that kicks your Taxi and causes £300 worth of damage?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:51 am
Posts: 104
grandad wrote:
Nemisis wrote:
A £5 dummy camera then would do the deterrent job just as well.

A £350 camera would also do the job just as well.

The chosen for us cameras have facility to spy on the drivers lifestyle, this is against basic human rights.

Why then are the trade forced to buy from chosen suppliers at extorted prices just to satisfy council snooping?


The council don't have automatic access to the content of the system. the only time that the system would be viewed would be following an incident. This would be instigated by either the driver or a passenger who has a complaint.


My point here was that the cost of the cameras is sky high to ensure they are turned on all the time and cannot be tampered...and its us that have to pay for it when there are equally capable systems around at a fraction of the cost. We are treated as automatically criminal and have to pay the price ourselves. I am quite certain that any driver complaint will not have the same dedication to follow up as a complaint against the driver by malicious punters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 902 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group