Sussex wrote:
Last night the Scottish Taxi Federation (STF), which represents black cabs, claimed the vast majority of disputes involved the drivers of private hire cars, who it accused of tarnishing the profession’s reputation. It raised concerns that anybody with a valid drivers’ licence, regardless of a criminal record, can apply for a private hire licence.
“There are very few serious complaints against taxi drivers. It’s more in the private hire sector,” said Jim Muldoon, chairman of the STF. “I’m not saying it doesn’t happen in the taxi trade but cases are few and far between. We would like to see more controls of the private hire industry as their behaviour besmirches our members. The police are failing in their duty by not clamping down on unlicensed vehicles.”
The article does at least acknowledge the difference between the two sides of the trade, but doesn't apply it properly to the story.
For example, it said that Aberdeen had the most complaints, but Aberdeen is 90% taxi, so presumably most came regarding taxi drivers, so to let Muldoon say what he said let him off the hook a bit. I think Muldoon is from the central belt, and since there are three times as many PH drivers as taxi in Glasgow then even if they get equal complaints then the PH side are bound to have more.
The article also says that anyone can apply for a PH badge irrespective of criminal record, but this is the same with PH surely, and thats not to say that the badge will be awarded, and as RD says above, the standards are generally the same.
And the article also says that the STF represents black cabs, well it does, but also the saloons in the likes of Dundee, so perhaps the writer wasn't fully aware of the difference.