Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 08, 2026 11:25 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Bury man left paralysed in horror taxi crash likely to receive multi-million pound compensation


But court has ruled that Alex Pearson, from Tottington, will lose 25 per cent of payout because he was not wearing a seatbelt

A young man from Bury who was “catastrophically” injured when a taxi skidded on ice is in line for multi-million-pound compensation.

Alex Pearson, then 23, had only been in the cab for two minutes when the driver lost control and smashed into an oncoming car in January 2010.

His head was propelled forward by the impact, at up to 70mph, and struck a structural pillar beside the windscreen.

Mr Pearson, of Tottington, Bury, suffered devastating spinal fractures and is now almost totally paralysed below the neck.

Tetraplegic and confined to a wheelchair, he will need 24-hour care for the rest of his life.

He sued the cab driver, Anwar Mohammed, of Heywood Street, Cheetham Hill, and his lawyers accepted primary liability for the accident.

But they successfully argued at Manchester High Court last year that Mr

Challenging that decision today at the Court of Appeal, Christopher Melton QC, said the 25% reduction was ‘extremely harsh’ on Mr Pearson.

He had been trying to put on his seatbelt when the collision happened and was ‘very, very unlucky’ that his head hit the pillar, rather than the softer windscreen.

Describing it as an “exceptional case”, the QC said the cab driver was “plainly far more blameworthy” than his passenger.

Refusing permission to appeal, however, Lord Justice Kitchin, said Judge Platts’ decision could not be faulted.

Had Mr Pearson been wearing a seatbelt, he would have suffered only “trivial” injuries, the judge told the court in London.

“This was a case where the failure to wear a seatbelt did, for all intents and purposes, make all the difference”.

Mr Pearson’s appeal against Judge Platts’ decision stood “no reasonable prospect of success”, he concluded.

The amount of Mr Pearson’s damages has yet to be finally assessed.

However, given the extent of his care needs, his payout is bound to run well into seven figures, even after the 25% reduction.

source: http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... or-9707856

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
Quote:
the QC said the cab driver was “plainly far more blameworthy” than his passenger.


unless the guy was driving like a jerk then the icy road would plainly be more blameworthy than the driver and equally as blameworthy as the passenger who failed to ensure his own safety by not wearing a seatbelt as required through by law..you can hardly blame the driver for that.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sussex and 613 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group