Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 08, 2026 9:36 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Emissions policy angers Shropshire taxi firms

Taxi and private hire drivers in Shropshire say they could find themselves out of business if Shropshire Council insists on their vehicles meeting European emissions limits.

The council wants to see all vehicles used for taxi or private hire comply with increasingly tough European emissions standards over the next three years.

But the drivers and operators say they will not be able to afford to replace all their vehicles so quickly. They say recent worldwide controversy over emissions is a further reason why the council should postpone new policy.

Drivers from across the county were today attending a Shropshire Council licensing meeting in an attempt to put across their message to councillors.

Shropshire Council confirmed that it would be responding to the issues during the meeting.

Tim Higgins, 50, from Oswestry, who runs Higgins Taxis, said he would go out of business if he had to replace his fleet of nine vehicles.

“If I go out of business that is 25 people who would lose their jobs,” he said.

He explained that drivers of new vehicles or those renewing licences between 2015 and 2017 will have to comply with “Euro 4” emission standards then “Euro 5” until 2018 and “Euro 6” after that.

“They are only just starting to make “Euro 6” compliant saloon cars. But as far as mini buses or wheelchair access vehicles go, I understand nothing is yet in production. They are not even manufacturing these vehicles yet.”

Mr Higgins said that drivers and operators had been campaigning against the Shropshire Council plans for some time.

“There is only one other council in Britain that we know of bringing in these emissions rules,” he said.

With the news breaking that several cars brands, under the VW empire, are fitted with emissions cheating software Mr Higgins said it was even more urgent that it was discussed by the council.

“I sent in an application asking to talk to the meeting but was told my request had been submitted five minutes too late.”

Frances Darling, Shropshire Council’s senior commissioner in business support and regulatory services, said: “The Euro 5 emissions issue has been raised by similar public questions that were submitted by other taxi drivers/operators within the required timescales, and therefore Shropshire Council will be responding to the issue as part of the meeting.”

source: http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2015 ... axi-firms/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
I'm sure all these councillors will changing there cars to?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Shropshire taxi drivers accuse council of ignoring their fears over regulations

Taxi drivers have accused councillors of ignoring their concerns over regulations they say will force them out of the trade.

A number of taxi companies used Shropshire Council’s Strategic Licensing Committee hearing, held at Shirehall, to call for a rethink over rules governing emissions and safety ratings for vehicles.

But, despite being told the regulations would cost jobs and potentially force taxi firms out of business, council officers rejected the request and said policies have to ensure public safety.

Tim Higgins, from Oswestry, was joined by a number of other drivers at the meeting yesterday who all warned the policies would cost jobs.

He said: “What I am shocked about really is the lady who got up to speak from Access Cars, she explained to the council that people are losing their jobs yet they didn’t seem to take that on board. It does not seem to be of any particular importance to them, It seems they have made their decision without considering what the response will be in the real world.

“People have tried to comply with policy but in reality it is not working out for us because people are losing jobs.”

Speaking after the meeting, Tina Brookes of Access Cars said she was frustrated at the council’s response.

She said: “They have ignored it. Completely ignored it. They did not have sufficient understanding to ask any questions about it. We have lost three cars in two months and those people are now unemployed.

“It is quite concerning for all of us, over the next 12 months you could see 60 per cent of the taxis that are on the streets disappear.”

The concerns centre around the requirement for vehicles to meet the NCAP 5 safety standard, and the Euro 5 emissions ratings.

Drivers say that only a number of vehicles reach both requirements and they are more expensive than what they consider acceptable alternatives.

The council had been asked to lower the requirements to NCAP 4, and to extend the transition period for emission ratings by two years.

A council officer admitted that drivers were facing higher prices to replace vehicles because of the regulations.

Mandy Beever, a public protection officer said: “We have received comment that prices at auctions have increased based on demand.”

In response to the requests, Frances Darling, the authority’s senior commissioner for public protection said the rules had been imposed to ensure public safety.

She said: “We do hear what people are saying in the room but are also conscious of a number of people who have gone and done what the policy requires of them in terms of getting the right vehicles to satisfy the requirements.

“The policy is fundamentally about protecting the public and ensuring public safety and we have to, as a council, put that at the forefront of the public safety process.”

An official response from the council reiterated Mrs Darling’s comments, and said financial considerations should not be placed above public health.

It said: “The council appreciates the proposals suggesting an extension to the transition periods; however, having considered these it is the council’s view that this will only serve to prolong the fundamental issues that proprietors do have to take on board whilst meeting all the requirements of a licensed operator.

“The council does not accept that simply removing the standards or giving too much weight to the economic implications is an appropriate way forward given the importance of ensuring the safety and promoting the health of the public.”

source: http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2015 ... gulations/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
They should all go licence over the border, you can clearly see yet another council that don't understand the trade, and another good reason we need national standards.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 628 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group