Taxi Driver Online

Man appealing taxi license refusal admits he was interviewed over 2014 murder of Paul Gallagher

A 33-year-old Dublin man who was appealing against a Garda chief superintendent’s refusal to grant him a taxi licence admitted in court that he had been interviewed at a Garda station in connection with the investigation into the murder of Paul Gallagher in 2014.

The 26-year-old father of one had been shot dead in July 2014. His body was not found until two days after the killing. Just one person has been charged in connection with the death, a man who was sentenced to six months in prison for withholding information.

The Gallagher death is still the subject of a live investigation by Gardai.

The applicant for the taxi licence, Paul Hayden, with an address at Park Lane, Grange Rath, Drogheda was in Navan District Court for the appeal last Friday.

Judge Miriam Walsh heard that he made the application for the licence last June and it was turned down by Chief Superintendent Fergus Healy last September.

Paul Hayden was not charged in relation to the Gallagher death. In court today, Paul Hayden was asked if he had been interviewed about the death and if he had been arrested.

He said he had gone voluntarily to the Garda station because he had known Paul Gallagher. However, the chief superintendent contended that he had been arrested.

Outlining the case for refusal of the licence the chief superintendent said that the applicant had 46 previous convictions between 2008 and 2011, mainly for road traffic offences but including four for driving without insurance and possession of a knife. It was contended that when filling in a form at Donnybrook Garda Station he had written down “minor convictions and refusing a sample as a youth”. The chief superintendent argued that he had been “economical with the facts”.

Paul Hayden told the court that he had been a carpenter on a major building site in Dublin but because he had family difficulties and needed certain hours to look after his eight-year-old daughter, the taxi hours would suit him.

In an application made at Ashbourne he had asked a Garda if it was all right to put down “minor charges” because he did not have the detail to hand of his convictions.

The convictions had happened when he was between 18 and 21 and he had had no convictions since. “I was young and stupid at the time and I made a few mistakes”.

His father had been a taxi driver but because of illness had had to give it up but was willing to “will” his licence to his son.

“I know that having a taxi licence is a privilege and not a right. I have turned a corner over the years. If I’m given an opportunity I won’t mess it up”.

_________________
IDFIMH

murder is NOT a mistake if there is any possibility of involvement in such a matter then the authorities need to err on the side of caution

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector

Somehow suspect your statement of the position here isn't quite legally watertight

Think it would need to be a bit more than 'any possibility of involvement'. And there's nothing in the piece that evidences 'any possibility' anyway. I mean, how many completely innocent people will be questioned with regard to many a murder?

But he has 46 previous convictions, mainly for driving stuff, and also for possessing a knife. And effectively tried to hide it all in his application. That's more than enough to reject his application.

it wasn't meant to be it was JUST my opinion

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector