Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 12:24 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
OldhamCouncil suspends three licenced drivers.

Oldham Councillors have suspended the licenses of three drivers - one hackney carriage driver and two private hire drivers.


The suspensions, each for 28 days, follow their conviction for public order offences after an incident on Yorkshire Street, Oldham in March 2006.

Councillors issued the suspension as a punishment.

The suspended drivers are:

Asif Hussain 36 of Savoy Street, Oldham (Hackney Carriage Driver)
Waheed Khan 28 of Kersley Street, Oldham Mohammed Ijaz Saleem 29 of Osbourne Road, Oldham

Each suspended driver has the right to appeal against their suspension to local magistrates within 21 days.
..........................


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
I can understand why drivers in areas like Oldham would disagree with my stance that councils remain best placed to decide local issues ........... when they encounter decisions like these.

A person is either fit and proper or they are not ............. suspending someones licence achieves nothing but financial hardship on these drivers families ................ after the suspension they are as fit and proper as they were before.

Obviously we don't know the facts surrounding this case and so cannot offer any opinion on it ....................... but the decision of the council should have been fit and proper or not, if you are fit and proper they you should retain their licence and if they are not then they should lose their licence.

A council should not have the power to apply a financial penalty by the way of a suspension, there is no reason for it other than if a licensee has been charged with an offence and they are considered a potential danger to the public whilst they await trial.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Today I spoke to the Chairman of Oldham licensing committee a Mr Brownridge. I must admit he appeared more than slightly inebriated but I could be wrong? However I asked him for the reasons why his committee suspended these 3 drivers and he told me it was because of a fracas in Oldham. I asked him was the 28-day suspension to protect the public or was it a punishment? He then started rambling on about the fact he is not only a councillor but also a lawyer. I told him I wasn't impressed and that he had a duty to inform the public why his committee took the actions they did and what were their objectives for making such a decision? So I asked him again did his committee suspend these drivers for 28 days to protect the public or did they suspend these drivers as a punishment?

His reply was "BOTH".

And I'm afraid that is exactly how I understood it to be when I first came across the suspension and I suppose so did everyone else on here who has an open mind about councillors?

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 569 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group