swannee wrote:
Jasbar wrote:
Right Mr Knowall, maybe you could tell us which "clear rules of the company" were breached?
I doubt you even know any of that company's rules, since all you repeat is hearsay and innuendo.
Surprise us all with some factual information for a change. Bet you don't have any facts to quote.
Are you saying Fleming didn't know that Colky had sold his taxi to him, retaining a directorship which he used to justify his position on the board?
Fleming knew nothing of this ruse?
And, if it wasn't a breach of rules, why the need to be devious, why not just declare the position?
Would the members have voted onto their board someone who didn't have a stake in a taxi?
Dearir me. Poor old Coolky. According to you there was no need for him to jump ship taking company data with him. What a massive error of judgement, eh?
Fact is in any normal Company the stench of Coolky's jumping ship would have only been cleansed by a full enquiry. Of course, those on the board would have held such an enquiry and wouldn't they have had to know also.
Dominoes come to mind here.
BTW Aly boy kindly gave us a copy of your rules and regulations while we were stiffing him and his process.
Shall I dig them out - publish them. As a record of the proceedings of course. I would be in my right to do so.
Which is why any sensible counsel would have taken our offer of silence for financial settlement. But you ersepiece leaders refused. That's the wisdom of your boys, Fleming included. Which suggests to me that he, and they, are not fit for office.