Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 2:39 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Banned Rotherham taxi drivers could still work in town, MPs warned



Taxi drivers banned from Rotherham in the wake of the child abuse scandal may still be able to work in the town, MPs have been warned.

Rotherham Council commissioner Mary Ney said that the introduction of tougher standards in the town has resulted in around 40 drivers losing their taxi licences.

But she said those turned down for licences in Rotherham may be able to get them from neighbouring local councils who do not have the same standards before returning to ply their trade in Rotherham.

Rotherham has introduced tougher standards - including CCTV in cabs - after the ‘prominent’ role of taxi drivers in the grooming scandal was highlighted in two reports.

Commissioner Ney told a hearing of the Communities and Local Government Committee: “We can and will get drivers coming from other parts, who are not at the same standard.

“We are talking with councils in the South Yorkshire region to try and see if we can all achieve the same standard locally, which will help, but there are some councils that have had lower sets of standards and they have licensed a lot of drivers, because you are not allowed by law to set a cap.

“It does present a problem because, if they operate in your borough, we cannot enforce against them; we have to require their licensing authority to enforce against them if there is a problem with their practice.”

When asked by MPs if drivers could go to a neighbouring authority if they are turned down in Rotherham, she said: “I think that we will probably see some of that because they will know our standards are higher and they will not come to us.”

She made the comments last week as part of an inquiry into the work of the commissioners, who were appointed by the Government in February 2015 in the wake of the abuse scandal.

Local government minister Marcus Jones told the inquiry today that new legislation currently going through Parliament is trying to ensure ‘consistency’ on taxi licensing rules across the country.

Read more: http://www.thestar.co.uk/news/banned-ro ... z4DSrmwMwE

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I don't think they are keeping up with things as most of the councils which have been used to license drivers/vehicles have tightened up their rules a little.

it is interesting to note that 40 have lost their licenses so you would wonder if Rotherham style improved screening was applied nationwide how many would become unlicensed

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
Local government minister Marcus Jones told the inquiry today that new legislation currently going through Parliament is trying to ensure ‘consistency’ on taxi licensing rules across the country.


:shock:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
Local government minister Marcus Jones told the inquiry today that new legislation currently going through Parliament is trying to ensure ‘consistency’ on taxi licensing rules across the country.


:shock:



really and what legislation would that be the ammendment 56 one ? police and criminal act ?

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
edders23 wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
Local government minister Marcus Jones told the inquiry today that new legislation currently going through Parliament is trying to ensure ‘consistency’ on taxi licensing rules across the country.


:shock:



really and what legislation would that be the ammendment 56 one ? police and criminal act ?


your guess is as good as mine - I don't know if you've noticed but the shower tend to say lots and do very little

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Taxi drivers banned from Rotherham in the wake of the child abuse scandal may still be able to work in the town, MPs have been warned.

Rotherham Council commissioner Mary Ney said that the introduction of tougher standards in the town has resulted in around 40 drivers losing their taxi licences.

But she said those turned down for licences in Rotherham may be able to get them from neighbouring local councils who do not have the same standards before returning to ply their trade in Rotherham.

Welcome to the 2016 taxi/PH trade. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:13 pm
Posts: 435
As I've said before 20% at least are licensed from rossendale etc so it's all balloni and on Saturday night anything goes!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
rayggb wrote:
As I've said before 20% at least are licensed from rossendale etc so it's all balloni and on Saturday night anything goes!


=D> =D>

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 4:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
rayggb wrote:
As I've said before 20% at least are licensed from rossendale etc so it's all balloni and on Saturday night anything goes!



There was a Gedling plated Rotherham private hire round here at the weekend.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 9:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 8:55 pm
Posts: 479
How did the ridiculous state of affairs of Hackneys being able to carry out private hire work anywhere come about in the first place?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Midlife martyr wrote:
How did the ridiculous state of affairs of Hackneys being able to carry out private hire work anywhere come about in the first place?



try reading up on the History of our trade hackney carriages have always been hired out on private hire (pre booked) work

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Hackney Carriages do not carry out private hire work,the booking is a pre-booked job for a TAXI,if you do not fulfil the obligation you can be hauled up in front of the Justices.

This does not happen with the private hire regime who can only take bookings for the provision of supplying a private hire vehicle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
heathcote wrote:
Hackney Carriages do not carry out private hire work,the booking is a pre-booked job for a TAXI,if you do not fulfil the obligation you can be hauled up in front of the Justices.

This does not happen with the private hire regime who can only take bookings for the provision of supplying a private hire vehicle.

Are you saying that a private hire operator can't sub contract work to a hackney carriage? This kind of sub contracting has always been done.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 8:55 pm
Posts: 479
My point is not that hackneys are able to do pre booked work it is why are they able to do it anywhere in the country? And not just in the area they are licensed in ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2016 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
heathcote wrote:
This does not happen with the private hire regime who can only take bookings for the provision of supplying a private hire vehicle.

[-X

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 898 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group