Mick wrote:
Claude wrote:
I also think that your site and Alan Fosters site's were destroyed by self importance of the owners.
These pictures, as foul as they were, are a bit of a red herring.
Claude
Thank you Claude, its nice to know that your love for me has never deminished.
TTFUK had nearly 2000 members, how many of those were banned Claude baby, just a guess will do?
Lets make it multiple choice to make it easier A-1, B-2 or C-3.
Carry on.
B. Lucky
(btw Claude darling does my using "be lucky" still upset you)
Unlike the gang of three I have no personal animosity. Just because I took issue with the didactic dictates that the owners of these sites handed down doesn’t mean I disliked the owners. Even when I was called scum, scum of the earth and [edited by admin] I had no strong feelings of dislike for the posters I just knew they had lost the argument and this is how they dealt with it.
It doesn’t matter how many were banned just the banning of even one just because that one poster had the temerity to challenged is one banning too many.
Do tell me why did your site and Alan’s site fail? The latest failure was not due to the cascading [edited by admin], now, was it? I will save you the trouble of applying the phrase to me (even though you may think I’m a cascading [edited by admin]) I am talking of the pictures. So I said it first, alright.
>>”btw Claude darling does my using "be lucky" still upset you”<<
Still upset me! It didn’t upset me in the first place! I thought I would have a bit of fun and tease you, as I know that trying on proper taxi drivers clothes is a habit that you PH drivers indulge in (what are you this week?)It obviously worked a treat.
Claude.