gusmac wrote:
Skull wrote:
I'm not sure if you are correct on this one. As a number of years back, I challenged the airport on Jubilee road being private by pointing out there was no gate to be close this road, making it a private road with public access, and a few weeks later a gate appeared. I am pretty sure that for land to remain private, a gate must be closed on the land a number of times a year.
There is something written into Scott's law about private land and public, rights of way. A private car park, for instance, doesn't become a public car park just because the public has use of it.

Oh and I should also point out. The police were threatening to ban me from the airport at the time, and they couldn't do it because I had a right of access.

The requirement re a private road is that it must be closed to the public for a full 24 hours, at least once a year to remain a private road.
This isn't the point at issue here though.
The point is the definition of a
public place, rather than whether a road is public or private. It can be either and still be a
public place.
A
public place need not be a road, or even outside. Any place to which the public have access is a
public place, for as long as the public have access.

Gusmac, take into context, the fact, the airport can (do what the fu*k they like) change any access point, road, car park or "rank" people waiting in line, to suit their aims.
You are dreaming, if you think, you have a definitive interpretation of the above. Do me a favour and read what you have written, again?
Honestly, Gusmac, I've been at this a lot longer than you, and even I, would not nail my colours to the mast on this one.
