Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Jun 10, 2026 5:23 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 219 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Skull wrote:

The NTA and the likes are just sewers full of rats. Fight for their members, that's a good laugh. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Quite, I suppose it takes one?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57484
Location: 1066 Country
Skull wrote:
So what organisation should I join to have full legal representation in a court of law?

:-|

I think you might bankrupt a few. :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57484
Location: 1066 Country
What makes the actions of this council/licensing team/councillors so odious is that they have suspended on safety grounds under (2A) and (2B) of the act i.e. no stay on appeal.

Whereas if they had suspended under (2)a and (2)b an immediate right of appeal would be allowed.

This tells me that the odious lot are sh** scared of facing a court trying to justify putting people out of work for parking on yellow lines.

They should all be thoroughly ashamed of themselves, and I intend, with others, to make sure no-one ever forgets the names involved.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57484
Location: 1066 Country
Might be worth asking the odious bunch when councillors last reviewed their use of RIPA powers.

According to LACORS they should be doing it every 12 months, including quarterly updates. :-$

http://www.lacors.gov.uk/lacors/NewsArt ... x?id=23113

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
As I mentioned to someone today.

If the offence was as serious as the LA state......why did they give a verbal warning then a written warning to the drivers concerned?

Surely if the offence warrented a section 52 there should have been no warnings at all.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
captain cab wrote:
As I mentioned to someone today.

If the offence was as serious as the LA state......why did they give a verbal warning then a written warning to the drivers concerned?

Surely if the offence warrented a section 52 there should have been no warnings at all.

CC


Image

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
captain cab wrote:
As I mentioned to someone today.

If the offence was as serious as the LA state......why did they give a verbal warning then a written warning to the drivers concerned?

Surely if the offence warrented a section 52 there should have been no warnings at all.

CC

Very good point indeed & one that would be very persuasive in any legal action that the aggrieved drivers might eventually decide to take.

I wonder if HC drivers and proprietors, other than those directly affected by this mis-use of Section 52, could be deemed to be an aggrieved party?

And before you say 'No' to that question; stranger things have happened in English law.

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
Very good point indeed & one that would be very persuasive in any legal action that the aggrieved drivers might eventually decide to take.

I wonder if HC drivers and proprietors, other than those directly affected by this mis-use of Section 52, could be deemed to be an aggrieved party?

And before you say 'No' to that question; stranger things have happened in English law.


Swansea vs Davies?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:26 am 
They are all back at work today and tomorrow.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57484
Location: 1066 Country
Nigel wrote:
They are all back at work today and tomorrow.

Have there been any fresh drivers added to the list?

And is the rank being used in accordance with the council rules, or has nothing changed?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:05 pm 
Sussex wrote:
Nigel wrote:
They are all back at work today and tomorrow.

Have there been any fresh drivers added to the list?

And is the rank being used in accordance with the council rules, or has nothing changed?


Still the same nothing has changed, I've been parked on double yellow lines for the last 3 weeks and I've heard nothing.

I think the Council have realised they've dropped a big b o l l o c k, none of the NTA drivers have been letter dropped from the Council.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57484
Location: 1066 Country
Nigel wrote:
Still the same nothing has changed, I've been parked on double yellow lines for the last 3 weeks and I've heard nothing.

I think the Council have realised they've dropped a big b o l l o c k, none of the NTA drivers have been letter dropped from the Council.

Well let's hope the national lobbying has worked.

But we all need to remember the report being put before the Cabinet on Sept 16th.

Councillors need to know what is being done in their names and to stop it.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Nigel wrote:
They are all back at work today and tomorrow.


Get them all to make a claim against the council for loss of earnings


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
skippy41 wrote:
Nigel wrote:
They are all back at work today and tomorrow.


Get them all to make a claim against the council for loss of earnings


On what grounds? They never even appealed against the suspension.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Cost of appealing
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 431
A council solicitor in Manchester today was heard to say, after winning a case being appealed, that there are few appeals being placed at the Magistrates since the new fee increase. Further inquiries have indicated the cost of LODGING an appeal in Magistrates has risen from £50 to £200. Appeals to a higher court have risen to £500. Has anyone experience of this.? If true, it is a backdoor way of denying a working man any sort of justice. Of more concern is that if someone cannot afford to lodge an appeal they are out of work and then have to rely on benefits and the public purse. This also, if true, cannot be allowed to go on.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 219 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 338 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group