2leftfeet wrote:
Quote:
far from being a mug trotskys twin ,if this contract was advertised correct it would of never been taken on in the 1st place ,now i dont about your manor trotskys twin but in my manor the rank work as died a death and the p/h arnt fairing much better either ,but im in a catch 22 situation if i hand the contract back on 7 days notice how quick do you think the council will be in offering out a new school contract
,if i could replace the work straight away and suffer no loss the contract would be gone ,as rightly been stated most contracts are good work or otherwise we wouldnt do them ,so when this contract as run its course one will not be tendering for s.e.n work again ,if parents want us to be escorts,first aiders ,guards,then they should seek alternative transport because theres no way councils will pay the extra dollar for the expertise required to transport these kids its usually lowest bid wins despite what the council say and dont forget theres a huge differance between school contracts and s.e.n school contracts
So thats it then "THE LOWEST BID WINS" good old EU and Tory with of course new Labour policy and you burkes crawl through the slime to get yer snoughts in the trough, surely the children deserve Escorts First Aiders Security but while you lot are prepared to grovell for a crust what chance have they got.
Others make valid points about rural areas and poor road access which I accept.
Overall I think the cab industry involveld in these contracts are despicable many i have contact with will not prostitute themselves for this effing nonsense
_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity
I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT
http://www.republic.org.uF88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND
BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE
Login
Register
FAQ
