Stationtone wrote:
Quote:
A successful and stable political and economic union 300 years old,
hahaha i think you will find that arrogant statement is why a growing number of people living in Scotland want independence and if that's your argument for the union then i am sorry to say the gemmes up the pollie
Look Tone I'm no fan of any politician, but compared to the EU the UK has to be viewed favourably, which is why you ignore my point and instead accuse me of arrogance. Perhaps you're the arrogant one in completely ignoring the UK v EU comparison.
In my younger days I was a big fan of the EU and the euro as well, but over the years I've come to realise that it's all idealism that doesn't quite work in practice.
I doubt if Scottish independence will make much difference to me personally, but from where I'm standing it's all idealism that may or may not work. At least with the UK you know where you are - better the devil you know.
stationtone wrote:
Quote:
After the second world war ended the United Nations comprised 51 independent nations. Today that figure has risen to 193.
that's reality .
So what are you trying to say - that Scotland in the UN would have even less influence than it would have had at the end of WWII, which would have been just about nil?
Anyway, the UN is just a talking shop, but where sovereignty really matters - in the EU, most obviously - Scotland would just be steamrollered by the likes of France and Germany.
The EU is increasingly moving towards a US of Europe or a EUSSR, so if you want Scotland to be truly independent then Alex Salmond and the SNP are going completely in the wrong direction.
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOa64BUV5qU SCOTLAND'S STORY a Scotland i am proud of
Yes, not bad tune and I quite like the Proclaimers, but fine sentiments in a song have nothing to do with the real world. If that kind of thing is the source of your political inspiration then that's the sort of thing that worries me
