Skull wrote:
Fairplay wrote:
CC, i was pointing out that if a vehicle such as mine was an over-priced heap of scrap, it wouldn’t have lasted 12 years. The fact that your LA wouldn’t allow it is neither here nor there, Edinburgh does. I also think you have a selective memory.... Don’t know why tho’.
I've never seen a taxi that wasn't an over-priced heap of scrap. Twelve years old or not, they are buckets. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!! ARS*HOLE

And with a suspension system designed in the 1940s.
In a free market it's the customer who decides.
Hacks in Edinburgh don't operate in a free market. But PH are now bringing it to them.
As I said, from having the whole market to themselves, hacks are sleepwalking into a niche market. Fact is, restriction is a red herring.
PH are not reestricting. With every new licence the trade resists, PH add another two, eating hacks market share as it does so. What part of this doesn't the trade understand.
Already customers think taxi, they think PH. To them PH is a taxi.
What's happening is that the taxi trade is becoming relevant only at peak periods and weekends. Rest of the time they're clogging up the social clubs that taxi ranks have become. Drivers rushing to the gossiup points so that they can moan about how bad things have become, recharging their stupidity to come on these forums and doff their cap to the status quo which is rendering them commercially impotent.
Restriction is giving PH the critical mass in the hire car market. And with that comes power. Think about what a mixed PH fleet operating vehicles matched to customers' needs for quality, service and cost effectiveness, using tariffs lower than the hacks, is going to mean to your earnings.
What I'm really telling the bright boys in the trade is - It's already too late.
You have only yourself to blame.