These councillors are corrupt.
They don't have current up to date information to justify refusal under 10(3), but they do it anyway.
The law wasn't framed to protect the council's transport interests.
It wasn't framed to protect city and central.
Yet we have a council doing just that.
The information used was out of date, generated by incompetent authority and relied on evidence presented by two companies which wasn't analysed or audited, and two companies who have history in doctoring information and who have objected consistently to licence applications.
Anyone prepared to defend our democratic system?
So, it's back into court again.
Remember it's CEC that is out of step here. They deny every vestige of common commercial decency, operating a restriction that contravenes every market principle.
This mess is not going away. More licence and taxpayers' money defending unaccountable councillors.
Never mind, accusations of corruption can be made at hustings, in public, which would force them to take legal action to defend their reputations. Now wouldn't that be interesting. How many of these corrupt RC stepford councillors would even understand the argument, far less be able to defend it.
Isn't it time to get down and dirty?
Isn't life in Scottish **** Party Scotland no different to New Labour **** Scotland?
