toots wrote:
They may well go ape but will they actually be able to do anything about it? A ph office is a legitimate business and so long as it meets the criteria there is no reason why it shouldn't be there. Perhaps the taxi drivers of Liverpool should have thought about an office first instead of spitting their dummy out when things don't go to plan (meant loosely of course cos they don't have a plan). I'm not entirely sure what implications you're thinking about tbh. With regard to the NVQ, you have to remember that unions are run like a business and the revenue from the courses helps to fill the coffers. If the drivers wanted a fair representation for themselves they should have joined a union or association that isn't representing both sides of the trade imo.[/quote]
The plan i don't know, has Tony Mullane is the National Secretary for the NTTG (National Taxi Trades Group) Got a plan for Liverpool ? Is that the way forward to compete with buses.(He's down the Mayors ear holes )
Have Unite got a plan? most of their members drive Hackneys?
Have the big fleet owners got a Plan? i see the biggest had 80 plus cabs and plates now has 50 odd.
Perhaps they would come on here and tell us, because i am ukked if i know
I think they have all given up. As for implications, you have been to Hanover street, what would you get into a cab charging £20
or a car charging £13 He's got 400 cars. that could double to 800 he expects to be up and running by Christmas .
Regards Acars21