Taxi Driver Online

JD, you have me at a disadvantage, but you might be able to rectify the problem,
how do you discredit someone who does not exist??? ps, I do not think that cap is guilty of what you're accusing him 2=2=5

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

I don't think I mentioned anyone by name did I?

Why would you mention this Wayne person?

Are you suggesting that Nigel is capable of inventing this deliberate lie all on his own? What purpose would it suit someone like Nigel who everyone knows hasn't got a clue about case law? I'm afraid Nigels circle of friends are limited and everyone who subscribes to this forum knows exactly where those limitations Start and End?

If he hadn't kept on repeating the lie then my suspicions wouldn't have been aroused and I wouldn't have even taken a second glance at his stupidity. However there had to be a more sinister motive behind his unfounded accusations and I believe if he knows what they are then so might you and the rest of your Motley crew. The reason being is because you are all like peas in a pod and I find it hard to believe that if such a conspiracy was hatched by the man from Carlisle then it is quite possible that the whole motley crew of you would know about it?

Regards

JD

I have edited my post, you can edit yours if you want. R U sleeping with the light on or off.

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

I did not ask you to edit your post your post has nothing whatseover to do with me but I suspect this Wayne person may wonder why you put his name in the Frame? Do you know something I don't? What are you trying to rectify?

Regards

JD

Are you suffering from memory loss one minute you are calling a person by their Nic next minute you're calling them by their proper name, I altered the post to help you with your paranoia, I hope they don't leave you with anything sharp.

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

You mentioned the name Wayne not me. I answered your original post which quite clearly said wayne. Just because you edited the name means absolutely nothing. So who is this wayne person?

Regards

JD

Just to keep you happy, John, Peter, Michael, George, Bernard, Philip, Tom, Harry, Colin,

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

Is it not possible that Mr Marchant has his own mind JD.

I find it a bit rich that you regard yourself to be in a position to issue treats in regard of people conspiring to discredit you after your antics within another threat where you have launched a witch hunt against the reputation of another member of this forum.

Does it not follow that you should accept a "nasty little shock" from the person you have tried to discredit .............. or do you invite it.

You currently have an advantage over every opposer, that being that you know the full name and location of everyone speaking against you. But for how much longer ................... time will tell.

Mick Pollard

B. Lucky

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.

Your argument seems to say that if someone wants to wash their linen in public then people shouldn't be able to point out that it's a bit dirty.

Where does this end? If someone in the trade commits theft or a sexual offence then we aren't allowed to mention it?

It all comes down to your basic problem - you don't like the truth, and you don't like people disagreeing with you.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Dusty I have been coming on forums such as these for how many years?

Do you not think that if I had a problem with people disagreeing with me then I would not have continued?

The simple facts that cannot be disputed is that policies are formed by the local authorities, so why hasn't the Licensing Officer been named.

It is also prudent for any association to act within the decision of the majority of its members and it is the elected representatives to present that decision to the council. It is therefore not reasonable for any individual to be named if they are putting forward the decision democratically made by the membership of the organisation they represent.

If a proposal is made by an individual then that individual must be prepared for the criticism or challenge ................ but JD has overlooked this and named an individual within an organisation, without a thought or evidence that shows that individual even proposed this activity .............. the phrase "shooting the messenger" springs to mind considering the evidence offered.

Maybe he should post the name of the LO .................. or is the truth not as clear as he portrays.

B. Lucky

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.

Are you trying to say that Nigel dreamed this up all by himself, after three years of me posting case law? What purpose and motive would Nigel have to come out with a statement like that. He's knows absolutely nothing about case law and he would probably be the first to admit it.

Perhaps your putting Nigel in the frame to keep the real culprit insulated?

Within the space of a few days after I exposed the unlawful practice in Carlisle, he consistently repeats a lie for no apparent reason? A lie which no one in their right mind believes.

It wasn't the fact that he said it, it was the fact that he keeps repeating it, knowing it to be false. I know he's not the sharpest knife in the draw but the law has a name for repeating with malice something you "KNOW NOT TO BE TRUE" but obviously that doesn't bother Mr Marchant.

I have therefore come to the conclusion that Mr Marchant is having his strings pulled by one of you lot and the man right at the top of the tree is the man from Carlisle. I also believe that if this is a conspiracy which I believe it is, then you and your motley crew will know about it because you all pizz in the same pot.

I notice Mr Marchant can't substantiate his claim so it makes you wonder why he was prompted to say it in the first place. Nigel would never ever think of saying I doctored case law because he is incapable of understanding it. Therefore whoever put him up to it isn't very bright.

If Nigel gives me a reasonable explanation why he keeps repeating this lie then I might re evaluate my assessment of this issue but until then I will believe someone is pulling his chain and that you and your motley crew know about it.



I find it a bit rich that a person can blatantly lie and instead of denouncing them Mr Gateshead Angel supports them. However we all know the cut of your jib, so that doesn't surprise us in the least.

The difference between Mr Marchants utterances and my own is that mine are based on facts and his are nothing more than a tissue of lies. It is no Wonder that the forum he runs or used to run is commonly known as the "liars forum".

As for the situation in Carlisle that you "Support", I say this.

If it wasn't for me this illegal activity by the local authority would never have been exposed. Those vested interests who benefit from this illegal condition including the local TOA and Mr Casey had no intention of ever letting the situation become known. I notice the Acting secretary of the NTA never chose to mention it on his soap box in the magazine Taxi Talk? I also notice that the Beacon of light Editor of Taxi Talk also conveniently forgot to mention it? Perhaps he was more concerned about concealing the illegal activity than reporting one of the biggest stories to ever hit the Taxi trade? Do you think that's a coincidence?

People don't need me to shed any light Mick Pollard because they can already see what you're all about? You support illegal activities in Carlisle because your bosom buddy just happens to benefit by excluding 60% of the local Taxi trade from a Taxi rank.

People might not like my stance on equality and quality controls of drivers etc. but at least they know where I'm coming from and that I'm a cab drivers cabbie and not some idiot who hasn't got the balls to expose an illegal activity that works against the majority of cab drivers. Every last one of you guys who support this illegal exclusion in carlisle make me puke and the sooner you're facked off from the Taxi trade, the better.

If you and your rabble had anything about you which you don't, you would condemn the illegal activities in Carlisle regardless of who benefited. The fact is that you won't and to everyone on here, that speaks volumes.

I think you should go and read the Maud case just to satisfy your own conscience that its all right for Carlisle to "illegally" exclude 60% of the Taxi Trade from a public Taxi rank. In my opinion you really are a pathetic sad individual.

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cg ... /1526.html

Regards

JD

1,

http://www.soviet-empire.com/audio/ussr ... nglish.mp3

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!

Dear oh dear JD .............. reduced to clutching at straws.

I cannot remember stating that I agreed with the situation in Carlisle ............. what I did state was the situation in Carlisle seemed to be supported my the majority and as the membership of the TOA has increased it would be fair to assume that the majority of the lads there are happy with the situation.

Secondly, if you claim that this activity was illegal then surely your "attack" of it should be directed at the council officials who endorsed it. But you chose to highlight the TOA in blame generally and an individual specifically ............. why was that.

With regard your absolute hatred of Mr Marchant and your assumptions that he is not capable of thinking for himself and must have his strings pulled ................. I wonder from what that stems .............. is it because he speaks the real truth in a manner you cannot handle.

Mr Nigel Marchant and Mr Wayne Casey do not deserve to be so insulted by someone who is so sure of their statements that they hide their identity from everyone he deals with.

I'm tired of calling for you to make your accusations in your own name ............... I can't imagine why you would be so frightened to do so if you really believed you were right.

We should only assume you are full of $hit as you do not share our courage of our own convictions.

Name the LO as the person responsible for illegal activity or name no-one.

Mick Pollard

B. Lucky

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.

What has the licensing officer got to do with the fact that the NTA failed to represent 60% of the Carlisle taxi trade on this illegal rank issue? Wayne Casey told us the NTA is made up of about 100 taxi associasions in England and Wales, so shoudln't those Taxi associations have brought this illegal activity to light, especially after the Maud Case?

Back in January 2005 the NTA in a press release were quick to remind councils that the NTA were concerned about the number of local authorities removing restrictions? Yet the NTA deliberately fails to inform a council that they are breaking the law by excluding 60% of the local Taxi trade from a Taxi rank?

You are part of the NTA and close to Wayne casey so perhpas you should also shoulder part of the blame for keeping this illegal activity in place? Just when did you find out about this illegal activity in Carlisle?

It would appear to me that the whole sorry lot of this organisation has a great deal to answer for?

In Taxi Talk magazine, wasn't the NTA admin officers fav slogan as follows?

"youve got to join the NTA to change things, make the commitment, then whinge".

It would seem to me that the NTA is pretty selective in what they want to change, especially when it comes to an illegal condition that just happens to suit the current Acting Secretary.

Regards

JD

JD any association may at some time make a proposal for a change in Council Policy.

This proposal is generally made after a majority decision from the membership.

Even so, the decision as to whether the policy should be changed remains at the discretion of the council and so any illegal condition if enacted becomes the responsibility of the council.

It may or not be the fact that the Carlisle TOA support or supported this condition however I doubt that it was the intention of anyone concerned with its implementation to exclude anyone in the manner you suggest.

More likely it is the case that this condition was enacted to encourage people to purchase the more expensive WAV whilst not restricting entry to the trade to anyone who wished to enter it.

What I disagree with within your postings is the claim that this is the responsibility of one individual and the assumption that in some way this would benefit his business or himself personally. I know, and I can tell you that the person you have named has saloon vehicles himself which are excluded by this condition, surely therefore it would be in his interest to have these vehicles working from that particular rank.

The alternatives were to stop issuing saloon plates and insist that all vehicles were WAVs ............. but I guess the same people that are complaining to you about exclusion would be as aggrieved if they were forced to purchase a WAV.

To be honest I'm unsure about how I would react if I had to encounter this same situation ............... but one thing is for sure I would be more willing to apportion blame in the councils direction than anywhere else as the ultimate responsibility for taxi licensing is theirs.

Your comments relating to the NTA are unfair, I was aware of the situation in Carlisle and after talking to many taxi drivers during conference last year which was held in Carlisle I formed the opinion that the majority of the drivers were accepting of the situation and so concluded that the TOA were conducting their activities within the direction of their membership.

I believe it is your intention to discredit the NTA as it will oppose the suggestions made by your friends at the NCC with factual evidence that the claims made within their recommendations were nothing more than inaccurate assumptions intended to scaremonger.

Mick Pollard

B. Lucky

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.