Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 6:49 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:03 am
Posts: 486
Location: dundee land of many plates
just because you are dead and burried does not mean someone cant dig you up and cause more grief, our country has many grave robbers as well as many lawyers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 12:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
dundee wav wrote:
just because you are dead and burried does not mean someone cant dig you up and cause more grief, our country has many grave robbers as well as many lawyers


Burke and Hare lol more akin to Edinburgh.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 12:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 7:35 pm
Posts: 173
Location: Dundee
JD wrote:
[
Because of the ruling in the court of session I can't see Dundee council ever going back to a policy of restriction.

Regards

JD


I wouldnt put anything past that lot.

Its difficult to tell what broke the camels back. The hire plate issue, a lot of bad publicity about lack of wheelchair cabs (about half a dozen in the city) and the 203020 case all came to a head at the same time. So they could sort all three out in one fell swoop, except that the hire plate problem is still around but less widespread.

_________________
Dundee rocks. Almost.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
JD wrote:
The number of licensing authorities especially in England and Wales that practice numbers restrictions has decreased dramatically in the past year. Perhaps the issue of restricting licenses is more "Moral than ethical".

Some people might think that selling a license for a large fee after obtaining the license in a free issue is unethical but not in my eyes. I think the person selling the license is just taking advantage of the system created by the licensing authority.



I don't want to get into a protracted debate on the issue, and there's a danger of several related concepts like ethics, morality and fairness being used a bit loosely in what I'm about to say, but in general terms my stance is the following.

In the final analysis the fault lies with govt and the LA.

And I don't really view someone as acting unethically if they sell a plate at a profit, for example, having held it for a number of years.

However, if someone is stealing a march on other people by utilising their superior knowledge of the trade to obtain several plates and selling them on for an immediate profit then there's just something a bit unfair about the whole thing.

It reminds me of the guy on a previous forum who made in pretty clear that he had dumped his plates because of what he had learnt on the forums, and he clearly thought he was taking advantage of the person who bought the plates because the latter clearly didn't know the score - not illegal, but unethical I would say.

Same if a driver agrees an out of town trip at £3 a mile when the going rate is £1.50 - unethical, but not necessarily illegal.

The plate situation is a bit more complex, but in all conscience if the opportunity arose for myself then I wouldn't take it, but if I did then I would do so on the basis that I knew I was wrong :oops:

I suspect Skull thinks likewise, which is perhaps why he wouldn't disclose the number of plates he's applied for.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Skull
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
JD wrote:
I think most of the Taxi trade in Scotland will be aware of the significance of the Coyle case especially after Dundee. You mentioned persons on the waiting the list were probably unaware of the significance of the Coyle case but since 1998 the ruling was there for all to see. You mention that Dundee brought very little to the Coyle ruling. What Dundee actually did do is lower the accepted time frame of a survey and establish firmly the ruling in the Coyle case that a licensing authority in Scotland when refusing an application must be in possession of recent evidence that there is no demand which is not being met. The Dundee case also set the precedent in Scotland of the status of applicants on a waiting list.

It is obvious that the majority of the Taxi Trade and indeed most licensing authorities in Scotland were unaware of the implications in the Coyle case, until Dundee came along. The Dundee case probably did more to concentrate minds to the fact that Historical surveys could no longer be relied upon. The Coyle case centred on a survey that was six years old, the courts made the right decision because a six-year-old survey is without doubt historical. The Dundee case lowered the historical level to at least two years and also enforced the ruling in the Coyle case that a council had to always be aware of the presence or absence of unmet demand.



We've discussed this at length before, but I can't see how the Dundee case was relevant to the time frame of the survey - if a survey had been undertaken a month before the plates were applied for the result would have been the same, as no contemporary information would exist for the applications to be assessed, even if only a month had elapsed since the survey.

The Scottish cases don't seem to regard independent surveys as having any shelf life at all, ie they're past their sell by date as soon as they are on the shelf.

I think the main thing that Dundee added to Coyle was that the decision could be utilised to queue-jump the waiting list.

But I don't think it added much to the substantive law as regards SUD, more a case of substantive lawyers exploiting a loophole to assist those at the back of the queue (or not even in it) to jump to the front.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Skull
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
JD wrote:
I think most of the Taxi trade in Scotland will be aware of the significance of the Coyle case especially after Dundee.


It depends what you mean by the 'trade', but I suspect the amount of people in the trade who are aware of the significance of Coyle is miniscule, indeed I suspect the vast majority have never even heard of it.

Thus I suspect that that's why the few who are in the know can exploit the situation to their advantage.

Your statement reminds me of what the OFT said regarding derestriction and those who had paid for a plate - ie the law was that LAs could pull the plug whenever they wanted, so they should know the law, but I think the fact is that most don't have a scooby.

I mean I recall not that long ago a leading public figure in the trade saying that LAs could only derestrict if there was unmet demand. Bollocks, of course, but by the standards of 99% of the trade I think this person could be considered an 'expert'. :lol: :?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
TDO wrote:
JD wrote:
The number of licensing authorities especially in England and Wales that practice numbers restrictions has decreased dramatically in the past year. Perhaps the issue of restricting licenses is more "Moral than ethical".

Some people might think that selling a license for a large fee after obtaining the license in a free issue is unethical but not in my eyes. I think the person selling the license is just taking advantage of the system created by the licensing authority.



I don't want to get into a protracted debate on the issue, and there's a danger of several related concepts like ethics, morality and fairness being used a bit loosely in what I'm about to say, but in general terms my stance is the following.

In the final analysis the fault lies with govt and the LA.

And I don't really view someone as acting unethically if they sell a plate at a profit, for example, having held it for a number of years.

However, if someone is stealing a march on other people by utilising there superior knowledge of the trade to obtain several plates and selling them on for an immediate profit then there's just something a bit unfair about the whole thing.

It reminds me of the guy on a previous forum who made in pretty clear that he had dumped his plates because of what he had learnt on the forums, and he clearly thought he was taking advantage of the person who bought the plates because the latter clearly didn't know the score - not illegal, but unethical I would say.

Same if a driver agrees an out of town trip at £3 a mile when the going rate is £1.50 - unethical, but not necessarily illegal.

The plate situation is a bit more complex, but in all conscience if the opportunity arose for myself then I wouldn't take it, but if I did then I would do so on the basis that I knew I was wrong :oops:

I suspect Skull thinks likewise, which is perhaps why he wouldn't disclose the number of plates he's applied for.


Fair comment but I've never got involved in the ethics or otherwise of buying and selling plates only to state that the practice is only possible because of as you rightly say the Government and licensing authorities.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
JD wrote:
[
Doing nothing in Edinburgh will just result in the status quo carrying on as it has done in the past, by taking legal action when the council may be in breach of current legislation is without doubt placing Edinburgh in a similar position to that of Dundee.

If TDO sits on the fence and does nothing then the position in Edinburgh doesn't change. But if TDO grasps the opportunity to show Edinburgh council that their policy is unstable then that in itself is a major contribution to the doubt Edinburgh council might have in retaining a policy that can be challenged at any time in the future. I believe that is why Dundee did what they did and that is why I say that every other council in Scotland who are living outside of the law should be brought into line.



You clearly think that the Edinburgh legal action might bring the whole thing down, and I don't doubt that you could be correct.

However, if they are forced to issue a couple of dozen plates then this is little more than nuisance value as far as the 'cartel' is concerned, and little changes - all they have to do is beef things up survey wise.

Indeed, given how concillors and councils clearly regard any change of policy as losing face then to that extent they won't give up easily.

But these things never seem to be done on rational grounds, so I won't try to rationalise it any further :D In the final analysis, it's the murky world of politics.

However, your point about Halcrow being dubious about the practicality of conducting ongoing surveys is interesting, since clearly if it can't be done in Dundee then it can't be done elsewhere.

But, as in England, many LAs will just carry on regardless unless someone at the local level takes action.

TDO doesn't sit on the fence - it's firmly on the derestriction side :D

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
TDO wrote:
JD wrote:
[
Doing nothing in Edinburgh will just result in the status quo carrying on as it has done in the past, by taking legal action when the council may be in breach of current legislation is without doubt placing Edinburgh in a similar position to that of Dundee.

If TDO sits on the fence and does nothing then the position in Edinburgh doesn't change. But if TDO grasps the opportunity to show Edinburgh council that their policy is unstable then that in itself is a major contribution to the doubt Edinburgh council might have in retaining a policy that can be challenged at any time in the future. I believe that is why Dundee did what they did and that is why I say that every other council in Scotland who are living outside of the law should be brought into line.



You clearly think that the Edinburgh legal action might bring the whole thing down, and I don't doubt that you could be correct.

However, if they are forced to issue a couple of dozen plates then this is little more than nuisance value as far as the 'cartel' is concerned, and little changes - all they have to do is beef things up survey wise.

Indeed, given how concillors and councils clearly regard any change of policy as losing face then to that extent they won't give up easily.

But these things never seem to be done on rational grounds, so I won't try to rationalise it any further :D In the final analysis, it's the murky world of politics.

However, your point about Halcrow being dubious about the practicality of conducting ongoing surveys is interesting, since clearly if it can't be done in Dundee then it can't be done elsewhere.

But, as in England, many LAs will just carry on regardless unless someone at the local level takes action.

TDO doesn't sit on the fence - it's firmly on the derestriction side :D


Dundee is very interesting because I believe a lot of thought went into the process of retaining numbers. They explored every option that was available to them in respect of restricting numbers and after doing so they came to the conclusion that the best option was to ditch the policy. I think the number of plates applied for some seventy plus was an overriding factor. They probably thought that if someone can legally obtain that amount of plates through the courts then what's the point of having a restricted policy. That's why I advocate anyone applying for plates in Scotland to fill their boots because it will certainly make a council think twice about the realism of their policy.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
The City of Edinburgh Council vr's 3Maxblack LLP 14/15 July

The City Council have lied and twisted everyway they can, now for the moment of truth.

To the victor the spoils!

Win lose or draw, I will publish the information Edinburgh Council have used in there application for the extended period. I will send you the legal arguments regardless of the outcome.


RealCabforce was right in one respect; I wouldn’t have missed this for the world. You might think I’m mad but let me tell you this, its a lot more fun doing it than talking about it.


I can’t wait!
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
Skull wrote:
RealCabforce was right in one respect; I wouldn’t have missed this for the world. You might think I’m mad but let me tell you this, its a lot more fun doing it than talking about it.

I know it's a big part, but apart from a few quid you have nothing to lose, so I think you are doing the right thing.

As for the outcome only time will tell, but I have a good feeling in my bones. But whatever happens you have bought a right s*** system, being endorsed by a right s*** council, to the attention of many people who didn't have a clue as to what's going on.

Sad thing is the ones with the most ignorance are the councillors who are meant to form policy. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Skull wrote:
The City of Edinburgh Council vr's 3Maxblack LLP 14/15 July


The City Council have lied and twisted everyway they can, now for the moment of truth.

To the victor the spoils!

Win lose or draw, I will publish the information Edinburgh Council have used in there application for the extended period. I will send you the legal arguments regardless of the outcome.


RealCabforce was right in one respect; I wouldn’t have missed this for the world. You might think I’m mad but let me tell you this, its a lot more fun doing it than talking about it.


I can’t wait!
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:



I think we can guess what information Edinburgh will use for their application of an extension. They will try and break new ground in the Scottish courts by stating your application has not been refused merely deferred for a short period of time while the council conducts a survey.

They may try and introduce in-house evidence that there is no sign of unmet demand.

I suspect they will quote English case law extensively so I hope your Brief is knowledgeable in that respect. If Edinburgh do quote English case law then Cameron will certainly play a part. Whatever the outcome I hope the law is clarified to the extent that there is no ambiguity in the decisions made.

Good luck

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
TDO wrote:
I don't want to get into a protracted debate on the issue


:shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
greenbadgecabby wrote:
TDO wrote:
I don't want to get into a protracted debate on the issue


:shock:

Indeed GBC, there is a first time for everything. :D

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
JD wrote:
Skull wrote:
The City of Edinburgh Council vr's 3Maxblack LLP 14/15 July


The City Council have lied and twisted everyway they can, now for the moment of truth.

To the victor the spoils!

Win lose or draw, I will publish the information Edinburgh Council have used in there application for the extended period. I will send you the legal arguments regardless of the outcome.


RealCabforce was right in one respect; I wouldn’t have missed this for the world. You might think I’m mad but let me tell you this, its a lot more fun doing it than talking about it.


I can’t wait!
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:



I think we can guess what information Edinburgh will use for their application of an extension. They will try and break new ground in the Scottish courts by stating your application has not been refused merely deferred for a short period of time while the council conducts a survey.

They may try and introduce in-house evidence that there is no sign of unmet demand.

I suspect they will quote English case law extensively so I hope your Brief is knowledgeable in that respect. If Edinburgh do quote English case law then Cameron will certainly play a part. Whatever the outcome I hope the law is clarified to the extent that there is no ambiguity in the decisions made.

Good luck

JD



Your almost spot on JD but one of the big problems they have is Jim Inch Director of Corporate Services has been cited as a witness. (Edinburgh Councils Head Man)


This so called Director has a lot of questions to answer the funny thing is he has signed letters that were written on behalf of himself by their legal department but is claiming he never read them. The press is going to have a field day with this, hopefully we will win and the victory will be twice as sweet knowing they were shown up for the incompetent arse holes that they are.


I can't wait.

\:D/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 133 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 440 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group