Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 12:28 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
How private hire firms tie drivers into self-employment deals

July 15, 2010

If you call a cab firm it's nigh-on certain that the driver who picks you up will be self-employed.

London-based Lancaster Private Hire has lucrative contracts with a string of big firms, including the BBC.

Most of its drivers are eastern Europeans who were told they could earn £400 or more a week in take-home pay.

However, we've heard that the reality for some is very different.

Alin Condrutz, from Romania, worked for Lancaster for two months last year and averaged £99 a week, after deductions for car hire, insurance and a security "bond".

Lancaster said their more experienced drivers were better paid and happy.

But should they really be called self-employed?

Lancaster provides their accomodation when they arrive in the UK, their vehicles and insurance, and all their work.

The GMB's national organiser for professional drivers, Terry Flanagan, says: "The private hire industry is rife with bogus self-employment, particularly among the larger companies."

Source; http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigation ... e-dri.html

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Good old Terry. :D

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
But should they really be called self-employed?

Of course they shouldn't.

It's a scam, and a not very clever one at that. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:42 pm
Posts: 322
Location: TW10
Just a fairly obvious way for the employer not to pay N.I, holiday, sick, pension...

To be self-employed in this industry (private hire), I think you should have your own car, be able to work for who you want (more than one firm at a time), when you want, and also refuse jobs.

However, this is difficult, since not many firms are going to hire you if you not available for a set period of time, and if you start cherry picking jobs, they're not going to be interested.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
"jockeys" have always been self-employed, when i did it 20 years ago it was 1/3rd for me, 1/3rd for the car and 1/3rd for the owner

i remember 1 night i ended up with £10....

:cry:

the I****d R****e have a test for self employment

Employed or self-employed?
In order to answer this question it is necessary to determine whether the person works under a contract of service (employees) or under a contract for services (self-employed, independent contractor). For tax and NICs purposes, there is no statutory definition of a contract of service or of a contract for services. What the parties call their relationship, or what they consider it to be, is not conclusive. It is the reality of the relationship that matters.

In order to determine the nature of a contract, it is necessary to apply common law principles. The courts have, over the years, laid down some factors and tests that are relevant, which is included in the overview below.

As a general guide as to whether a worker is an employee or self-employed; if the answer is 'Yes' to all of the following questions, then the worker is probably an employee:

Do they have to do the work themselves?
Can someone tell them at any time what to do, where to carry out the work or when and how to do it?
Can they work a set amount of hours?
Can someone move them from task to task?
Are they paid by the hour, week, or month?
Can they get overtime pay or bonus payment?
If the answer is 'Yes' to all of the following questions, it will usually mean that the worker is self-employed:

Can they hire someone to do the work or engage helpers at their own expense?
Do they risk their own money?
Do they provide the main items of equipment they need to do their job, not just the small tools that many employees provide for themselves?
Do they agree to do a job for a fixed price regardless of how long the job may take?
Can they decide what work to do, how and when to do the work and where to provide the services?
Do they regularly work for a number of different people?
Do they have to correct unsatisfactory work in their own time and at their own expense?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Reading the above, I would guess that the get out is the payment. They are not paid by the hour, week or month and they don't get overtime pay and I doubt that they get bonuses.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 4:56 pm
Posts: 529
Location: London
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
But should they really be called self-employed?

Of course they shouldn't.

It's a scam, and a not very clever one at that. :sad:

PH firms do not pay the drivers, the drivers pay them so how can the drivers be considered anything other than self employed?

_________________
There's no excuse for animal abuse. If you ain't vegan you are an animal abuser.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Bart wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
But should they really be called self-employed?

Of course they shouldn't.

It's a scam, and a not very clever one at that. :sad:

PH firms do not pay the drivers, the drivers pay them so how can the drivers be considered anything other than self employed?


i knew one courier firm who had drivers in ad-hoc and paid em using "i realise i am responsible for my own tax and NI contributions".........

then HMRC hit him with a bill for £115K and he had to sell the firm to pay the debt

you cant be SE and only have 1 customer, which most jockeys have, driving for 1 car owner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Bart wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
But should they really be called self-employed?

Of course they shouldn't.

It's a scam, and a not very clever one at that. :sad:

PH firms do not pay the drivers, the drivers pay them so how can the drivers be considered anything other than self employed?

Because the laws say so.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20852
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Normally if you rent the car you are self employed but split purse deals can be deemed to be employment if the incompetent revenue service can be bothered to challenge a company round here quite a few companies have percentage drivers but the money in is declared in the books as car rent


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:14 pm
Posts: 1
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
How private hire firms tie drivers into self-employment deals

July 15, 2010

If you call a cab firm it's nigh-on certain that the driver who picks you up will be self-employed.

London-based Lancaster Private Hire has lucrative contracts with a string of big firms, including the BBC.

Most of its drivers are eastern Europeans who were told they could earn £400 or more a week in take-home pay.

However, we've heard that the reality for some is very different.

Alin Condrutz, from Romania, worked for Lancaster for two months last year and averaged £99 a week, after deductions for car hire, insurance and a security "bond".

Lancaster said their more experienced drivers were better paid and happy.

But should they really be called self-employed?

Lancaster provides their accomodation when they arrive in the UK, their vehicles and insurance, and all their work.

The GMB's national organiser for professional drivers, Terry Flanagan, says: "The private hire industry is rife with bogus self-employment, particularly among the larger companies."

Source; http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigation ... e-dri.html


I hear that Addison lee in london is the largest employer of self employed cab drivers and they are boasting earnings in excess of 800 a week. is this true ? and does anybody know how this is acheived? i.e what do they earn on the fare and what do they have to pay in monthly rental etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Its all to do with who pays the fuel, as it says on the revenue site its that loophole that's taxi and PH owners are using to exploit drivers driving that company vehicles

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/paye/employees/s ... status.htm

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/employment-status/index.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
grzybov wrote:
I hear that Addison lee in london is the largest employer of self employed cab drivers and they are boasting earnings in excess of 800 a week. is this true ? and does anybody know how this is acheived? i.e what do they earn on the fare and what do they have to pay in monthly rental etc.

AL are the biggest licensed PH operator in London, but I personally doubt anyone on there takes home £800. :^o

Other than the bosses that is.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
grzybov wrote:
I hear that Addison lee in london is the largest employer of self employed cab drivers and they are boasting earnings in excess of 800 a week. is this true ?


For a week?

Wouldn't get out of bed at the weekend for that. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:42 pm
Posts: 322
Location: TW10
What they earn, and what they take home are two different figures.

I just did a quick quote on their website, £67.50 from Heathrow to W1. Do that 12 times a week (although unlikely), that will earn them just over £800, but their take home after the normal associated costs of renting and running one of their new Ford Galaxys, I doubt is £800 a week!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 661 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group